Live data from Hacker News

FCC approves test of space mirror to light night sky

theconversation.com

11–20 of 164 posts

Re: FCC approves test of space mirror to light night sky

#12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Annoyingly and predictably, reads like AI slop. You can practically guess the prompt goes something along the lines of 'write a press release explaining why this bad idea is a good idea'.

I think this company intentionally ignored discussing how battery storage has made solar energy a much more effective and viable solution.

Never mind that, they're ignoring light bulbs for the S&R stuff.

At least, best I can make out over this UI choice: https://imgur.com/gallery/bad-ui-5t0O0SH

(Why, of all the things, would someone use a fire as their example for this? Fire is famously a light source. Also, famously, smoke is a thing that blocks out light from above).

Re: FCC approves test of space mirror to light night sky

#15
How are the economics of this idea meant to be viable? The proposed business model is to park hundreds of millions to billion dollars of satellites in orbit, plus the costs to maintain and operate them, to meet the goal of selective area illumination and solar power. Ignoring the issue of cloud cover, which still seems to be an impediment. That's going to need to directly compete with terrestrial energy storage technology, e.g. batteries, and... general lighting. Both of which are well established, diversified and reliable market segments with vastly cheaper MWh costs compared to beaming a small amount of light down using a satellite.

This strikes me as another hand-waved scifi/fantasy inspired investment, where everyone is so caught up in proving they can achieve this (spoiler: this is obviously possible) that no one has stopped to ask does that achievement lead to a real benefit outside of VC wealth transference?

Re: FCC approves test of space mirror to light night sky

#16
post #15

How are the economics of this idea meant to be viable? The proposed business model is to park hundreds of millions to billion dollars of satellites in orbit, plus the costs to maintain and operate them, to meet the goal of selective area illumination and solar power. Ignoring the issue of cloud cover, which still seems to be an impediment. That's going to need to directly compete with terrestrial energy storage techn…

The revenue potential is huge. Think of public events where people might want to illuminate the area as daylight for several hours. Galas, sports, concerts, parties, etc.. They will all pay top dollar and they have the funds. Could get sponsors, "Today's sunlight brought to you by NordVPN"

Re: FCC approves test of space mirror to light night sky

#18
post #15

How are the economics of this idea meant to be viable? The proposed business model is to park hundreds of millions to billion dollars of satellites in orbit, plus the costs to maintain and operate them, to meet the goal of selective area illumination and solar power. Ignoring the issue of cloud cover, which still seems to be an impediment. That's going to need to directly compete with terrestrial energy storage techn…

Think of the military benefits.

Re: FCC approves test of space mirror to light night sky

#19
post #15

How are the economics of this idea meant to be viable? The proposed business model is to park hundreds of millions to billion dollars of satellites in orbit, plus the costs to maintain and operate them, to meet the goal of selective area illumination and solar power. Ignoring the issue of cloud cover, which still seems to be an impediment. That's going to need to directly compete with terrestrial energy storage techn…

The revenue potential is huge. Think of public events where people might want to illuminate the area as daylight for several hours. Galas, sports, concerts, parties, etc.. They will all pay top dollar and they have the funds. Could get sponsors, "Today's sunlight brought to you by NordVPN"

Frankly I don't see this happening before the year of the Depend Adult Undergarment

Re: FCC approves test of space mirror to light night sky

#20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Annoyingly and predictably, reads like AI slop. You can practically guess the prompt goes something along the lines of 'write a press release explaining why this bad idea is a good idea'.

I think this company intentionally ignored discussing how battery storage has made solar energy a much more effective and viable solution.

And also cheaper than launching stuff into space. This may have been approved but that's a long ways off from actual viability.
Post reply on HN