Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Madison Sq Garden database tracks hundreds. Labels "LGBTQIA," & low/high "risk."

wired.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

11–17 of 17 posts

Re: Madison Sq Garden database tracks hundreds. Labels "LGBTQIA," & low/high "risk."

#11

Post by pyuser583 »

galkk wrote: post #8
AlexandrB wrote: post #7

Joe Rogan's Comedy Mothership does something similar[1]. The worst part about these systems is that the lack of accountability and appeals process. If you end up on the "bad" list, you're banned and probably SOL. [1] https://www.cracked.com/article_38944_joe-rogans-comedy-club...

Hmm, nobody is entitled to a private property visit and owner can set any rules they like

That’s not true at all. There are many rules affecting public establishments, including privately owned ones.

Your house is your house, but once you establish a venue open to the general public, you have to follow rules.

Re: Madison Sq Garden database tracks hundreds. Labels "LGBTQIA," & low/high "risk."

#12

Post by galkk »

pyuser583 wrote: post #11
galkk wrote: post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Hmm, nobody is entitled to a private property visit and owner can set any rules they like

That’s not true at all. There are many rules affecting public establishments, including privately owned ones. Your house is your house, but once you establish a venue open to the general public, you have to follow rules.

Which rules are broken?

Like with guns (opening paragraph about removing concealed carry guns). The sign “no guns on premise” doesn’t have power of law, unless it’s like school, but if owner asks you to leave, you should comply, otherwise you will be trespassing

Re: Madison Sq Garden database tracks hundreds. Labels "LGBTQIA," & low/high "risk."

#14

Post by pyuser583 »

galkk wrote: post #12
pyuser583 wrote: post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That’s not true at all. There are many rules affecting public establishments, including privately owned ones. Your house is your house, but once you establish a venue open to the general public, you have to follow rules.

Which rules are broken? Like with guns (opening paragraph about removing concealed carry guns). The sign “no guns on premise” doesn’t have power of law, unless it’s like school, but if owner asks you to leave, you should comply, otherwise you will be trespassing

New York City specifically has laws that require establishments to admit journalists and critics.

Civil liberties come into play. I can discriminate based on race or sex in who I allow into my house, but not my storefront.

Some place have straight up public accolades requirements - if it’s open to the public, it has to be open to the public.

Re: Madison Sq Garden database tracks hundreds. Labels "LGBTQIA," & low/high "risk."

#15

Post by galkk »

pyuser583 wrote: post #14
galkk wrote: post #12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Which rules are broken? Like with guns (opening paragraph about removing concealed carry guns). The sign “no guns on premise” doesn’t have power of law, unless it’s like school, but if owner asks you to leave, you should comply, otherwise you will be trespassing

New York City specifically has laws that require establishments to admit journalists and critics. Civil liberties come into play. I can discriminate based on race or sex in who I allow into my house, but not my storefront. Some place have straight up public accolades requirements - if it’s open to the public, it has to be open to the public.

I feel that I’m reading AI answer. Nobody needs your generalizations. Stay on point.

Have you read the referred article? Did you look up the club rules? How are NYC rules related to it, is it in NYC?

What is your point? Because it is clear that you comment with your prejudice and preconditions, not with article.

Re: Madison Sq Garden database tracks hundreds. Labels "LGBTQIA," & low/high "risk."

#16

Post by pyuser583 »

galkk wrote: post #15
pyuser583 wrote: post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

New York City specifically has laws that require establishments to admit journalists and critics. Civil liberties come into play. I can discriminate based on race or sex in who I allow into my house, but not my storefront. Some place have straight up public accolades requirements - if it’s open to the public, it has to be open to the public.

I feel that I’m reading AI answer. Nobody needs your generalizations. Stay on point. Have you read the referred article? Did you look up the club rules? How are NYC rules related to it, is it in NYC? What is your point? Because it is clear that you comment with your prejudice and preconditions, not with article.

I think you intended to respond to a different comment. This is the one about Madison Square Gardens tracking database.

The first paragraph does not mention guns. Madison Square Gardens is not a club. And, yes, it is in NYC.

Re: Madison Sq Garden database tracks hundreds. Labels "LGBTQIA," & low/high "risk."

#17

Post by galkk »

pyuser583 wrote: post #16
galkk wrote: post #15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I feel that I’m reading AI answer. Nobody needs your generalizations. Stay on point. Have you read the referred article? Did you look up the club rules? How are NYC rules related to it, is it in NYC? What is your point? Because it is clear that you comment with your prejudice and preconditions, not with article.

I think you intended to respond to a different comment. This is the one about Madison Square Gardens tracking database. The first paragraph does not mention guns. Madison Square Gardens is not a club. And, yes, it is in NYC.

The parent of my reponse, that you answered to, was about Joe Rogan’s club. You didn’t read the thread

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48846925

Post reply on HN