Live data from Hacker News

The Making of Claude Code

anthropic.com

11–20 of 35 posts

Re: The Making of Claude Code

#11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You’re totally right! You’re not building a CLI tool, you’re building a game engine!

Guess I have to throw it in here… “/s” on my original comment

I bet most readers will get angry and reply before reading the full comment :-)

Re: The Making of Claude Code

#16
Claude itself (Opus) gave me the following conclusion:

> The article frames Claude Code as the latest step in a lineage from punch cards → ed → modern editors → AI agents. Multiple team members say they no longer write any code by hand. The overall tone is "we built the right primitive (read/edit/bash), bet on future model improvements, and it paid off."

Honestly I don't want to endure an awkward terminal interface and/or questionable design to just arrive at this conclusion.

Re: The Making of Claude Code

#17

Incredibly cringe. Literally every single medium mode problem for a team is framed as a groundbreaking achievement. These people snort their own farts.

I support this comment, at the expense of wanton karma forfeiture.

I think the fart snorting assertion can be proven. There is evidence.

Re: The Making of Claude Code

#18
Nauseating on so many levels. What are we celebrating, even? Authors themselves say that Claude does their work, so what is their input? It's been barely a year in production for what can be best described as a 'buggy mess'.

Re: The Making of Claude Code

#19
post #6

Why do I have to select if i want to read it in terminal or in the browser? I clicked the link, show me the text. You are not being clever, you are annoying.

You are absolutely right and I apologize. Would you like me to summarize the article in five short bullet points? Just give me the word!
Post reply on HN