Claude Code is steganographically marking requests
11–20 of 817 posts
Re: Claude Code is steganographically marking requests
#12The more I learn about Anthropic the more they disgust me. Finger crossed for all the companies from their “ban list”
Re: Claude Code is steganographically marking requests
#13Re: Claude Code is steganographically marking requests
#14Re: Claude Code is steganographically marking requests
#15Re: Claude Code is steganographically marking requests
#16Re: Claude Code is steganographically marking requests
#17The more I learn about Anthropic the more they disgust me. Finger crossed for all the companies from their “ban list”
Re: Claude Code is steganographically marking requests
#18[flagged]
Re: Claude Code is steganographically marking requests
#19[flagged]
Oh no, they're trying to steal the models that were trained on stolen data? That's horrible, I feel so bad for Anthropic.
Re: Claude Code is steganographically marking requests
#20This is very interesting. Combating resellers and distillation seems like a very difficult problem indeed. Interesting to me is that these techniques mentioned in the article are just like anti-observation techniques used by some of the more sophisticated malware out there, however defeating them is pretty trivial.
Here's an example. Say you have your team use patched binaries. Then CC updates and requires a new patched binary with new tricks. You now have to have a team ready to analyze the binary and begin to address the tricks; meanwhile, unpatched code is now a fingerprint. If some researcher decides to update Claude on their own to access new features, they get fingerprinted.
Defeating a single fingerprinting technique once is easy. Defeating all of the techniques all the time is hard.