Live data from Hacker News

U.S. government will decide who gets to use GPT-5.6

washingtonpost.com

11–20 of 1001 posts

Re: U.S. government will decide who gets to use GPT-5.6

#12

This is for the preview period, but it's not a good sign. Opus 4.8 may be the last frontier model available to the masses...

If it's the case then software engineers still have the same place as pre-ClaudeCode era, because 4.8 and 5.5 are damn good at algo but notoriously bad at architecture and coordination.

Re: U.S. government will decide who gets to use GPT-5.6

#15
post #10
post #5

Keep your **** models to yourselves.... the world really has moved on to open models which can give you good enough results at a fraction of the cost and zero BS licensing.

> the world really has moved on to open models Don't get me wrong: I'm all for open models, but I think it will get more and more difficult to distil-train them without (legitimate) access to frontier models.

As if all progress done in open models is because of distilling...

People have no idea and everybody pretends to be an expert and ignore how good China is on AI research

Re: U.S. government will decide who gets to use GPT-5.6

#16

This is for the preview period, but it's not a good sign. Opus 4.8 may be the last frontier model available to the masses...

Yes, we will get a crippled version of Mythos, 5.6 and future models, while the chosen few will have unfettered access.

Re: U.S. government will decide who gets to use GPT-5.6

#17

Open source is looking great right now

It's the year of the open source AI model is the new 'It's the year of the Linux Desktop'. It's not and never will be for 90% of people

Well if us gov would block people from using windows or macos, then it may well be.

Re: U.S. government will decide who gets to use GPT-5.6

#18
post #10
post #5

Keep your **** models to yourselves.... the world really has moved on to open models which can give you good enough results at a fraction of the cost and zero BS licensing.

> the world really has moved on to open models Don't get me wrong: I'm all for open models, but I think it will get more and more difficult to distil-train them without (legitimate) access to frontier models.

Personally, I find it rather humorous that we've moved from the fear that AI generated output would corrupt training to the idea that it is essential to training. Reality itself has not just a left bias but a bias to fundamentals. Bootstrap from fundamentals without introducing arbitrary error and you have the superior system; it just may not be highly compatible with a trash ecosystem.

Re: U.S. government will decide who gets to use GPT-5.6

#19

Why do I get the feeling the administration is doing this to buy a position in the AI companies before they go public. If non US citizens shouldn't have the models - wouldn't that cause both Anthropic and OAI to fire non-citizens?

because the administration has been repeating the same patterns over pretty much its entire existence.

Dont worry though, the rest of the entire world gets access to better chinese models :-), once they get a taste for those the US has lost their little trade game and the future truly belongs to China.

Its almost like they are serving it up on a silver platter.

ofc they are not, they are just betting all in their models will be better, which is unlikely. (just look at the chinese law and all the names atop of advanced AI papers...)

Re: U.S. government will decide who gets to use GPT-5.6

#20

This is for the preview period, but it's not a good sign. Opus 4.8 may be the last frontier model available to the masses...

Thousands of American engineers all over the country (most of whom probably aren't on Hacker News) work with ITAR/EAR-regulated software and hardware every single day: these regulations are really not difficult to abide if you're a citizen.
Post reply on HN