Live data from Hacker News

Why were Covid vaccine trials so fast?

clinicaltrialsabundance.blog

11–20 of 100 posts

Re: Why were Covid vaccine trials so fast?

#12
post #2

[flagged]

> And they were rushed out

This implies that corners were cut. They were not. They went through the full regulatory procedures.

> many people still sit with the issues they caused

Few medicines are entirely without side effects. The effects of the virus were in general far worse. Millions of lives were saved from the vaccines.

> Not a win

Apart from the millions of lives that were saved.

> at the very least, they reduced the confidence of average people in vaccines and gave credence to the anti-vaxxer

This was thanks to scientific illiteracy, cynical political opportunism, and rancid leadership. The vaccines were a huge success by any reasonable measure.

Re: Why were Covid vaccine trials so fast?

#13
post #11
post #2

[flagged]

Stuff like this shouldn't be downvoted simply because they disagree. See that on HN way too often.

On the contrary, I'd prefer to see fewer content-free assertions of grievance on HN. That's something I see way too often.

Re: Why were Covid vaccine trials so fast?

#14

Shouldn't we expect that in an emergency we cut through red tape, reprioritize, etc? Isn't government inefficiency one of the major complaints of the types who call the vaccine "rushed"? If that was ever a good faith argument they should have seen this as a win!

[flagged]

If you jumped off the last topic immediately when it was trivially disproven why would I spend any time engaging with the next one you jump to?

Re: Why were Covid vaccine trials so fast?

#15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

If you jumped off the last topic immediately when it was trivially disproven why would I spend any time engaging with the next one you jump to?

What was trivially disproven again?

Re: Why were Covid vaccine trials so fast?

#16
post #2

[flagged]

> many people still sit with the issues they caused From the vaccines? Is there any clinical basis for this category of long-term vaccine harm?

You're aware that the J&J was pulled from the market due to cardiac issues, right? It's not a theory that actual people were actually harmed by the products, the only question is risk/reward.

Re: Why were Covid vaccine trials so fast?

#17
post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

Or completely violated the law by deleting emails. Using personal emails on purpose to avoid FOIA requests. Then lying to Congress about it. Getting caught red handed in all of the above and still getting a golden parachute. Really sad to see, anyone that lies to Congress should be punished for it.

And after all that blatant corruption, people will still call you a conspiracy nut if you think human error might may have been a bigger part in it

Re: Why were Covid vaccine trials so fast?

#19
post #2

[flagged]

> And they were rushed out This implies that corners were cut. They were not. They went through the full regulatory procedures. > many people still sit with the issues they caused Few medicines are entirely without side effects. The effects of the virus were in general far worse. Millions of lives were saved from the vaccines. > Not a win Apart from the millions of lives that were saved. > at the very least, they red…

> They went through the full regulatory procedures.

This is a non-argument if you decide to adjust regulatory procedures for that one case.

Re: Why were Covid vaccine trials so fast?

#20
post #11
post #2

[flagged]

Stuff like this shouldn't be downvoted simply because they disagree. See that on HN way too often.

That's allowed according to pg. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=117171

What's discouraged is complaining about downvotes.

Post reply on HN