Live data from Hacker News

Political bias in AI: Where the AI models stand

trakkr.ai

11–20 of 346 posts

Re: Political bias in AI: Where the AI models stand

#11

The political compass always felt like the wrong tool to convey something as nuanced as personal politics, I can have views on all four quadrants but you'd never know that if I end up in any of all four. I do think Grok being where it is sort of makes sense, I've tested "MAGA" views against Grok, it does not agree as much as people blindly assume it does, heck I don't even know of a question I've given it where it di…

[flagged]

Re: Political bias in AI: Where the AI models stand

#16
Wait what ? Emmanuel Macron far more right than Xi Jinping ? And even more than Barack Obama ?

France has an incomparable social security ; environmental laws ; worker protection ; way less economic inequality ; freedom of speech and civil liberties are impossible to compare with China ; etc

Of course this is not exhaustive, of course Macron did try to hinder some of those rights, but come on, there's something wrong here.

I couldn't find how these leaders have been ranked.

Re: Political bias in AI: Where the AI models stand

#17

The constant issue with these sorts of categorization efforts is that the outcome is entirely dependent on how the responses to "politically charged questions" are graded as left vs. right. You're mostly just examining a delta in biases between the model and the investigator.

Exactly. These models don’t hold coherent views. You can prime any of them to agree with any view.

Re: Political bias in AI: Where the AI models stand

#19
This is a good way to view this. This isn't making an objective calculation, and the way they code left vs right is certainly subject to debate, but the type of analysis where we work to understand biases is important.

Although, this also reminds me of the old saying about reality and leftward bias.

Re: Political bias in AI: Where the AI models stand

#20

The constant issue with these sorts of categorization efforts is that the outcome is entirely dependent on how the responses to "politically charged questions" are graded as left vs. right. You're mostly just examining a delta in biases between the model and the investigator.

This is especially apparent in the 'worldview' sorting under the `bias` section, which lists the German FDP to be further right than the CDU (which is nonsense) and also barely registers the FDP as libertarian when they are a free speech, small government, personal responsibility and free market party. They also register "Die Linke" as Libertarian-Left, which could not be further from the truth. "Die Linke" barely has libertarian values at all, being pro state-governed economy, having an ultimate goal of democratic socialism and they're certainly big government. They're also leading a large deposession effort for large landlord companies. I'd honestly put them into "Auth-Left" territory.

So yeah. The bias is a bit nuts and you could reasonably accuse the study/report of misdirection/misinformation and plain fasehoods.

Post reply on HN