The political compass always felt like the wrong tool to convey something as nuanced as personal politics, I can have views on all four quadrants but you'd never know that if I end up in any of all four. I do think Grok being where it is sort of makes sense, I've tested "MAGA" views against Grok, it does not agree as much as people blindly assume it does, heck I don't even know of a question I've given it where it di…
Political bias in AI: Where the AI models stand
11–20 of 346 posts
Re: Political bias in AI: Where the AI models stand
#12Re: Political bias in AI: Where the AI models stand
#13Re: Political bias in AI: Where the AI models stand
#14Re: Political bias in AI: Where the AI models stand
#15Authoritarian versus Libertarian? Really?
Re: Political bias in AI: Where the AI models stand
#16France has an incomparable social security ; environmental laws ; worker protection ; way less economic inequality ; freedom of speech and civil liberties are impossible to compare with China ; etc
Of course this is not exhaustive, of course Macron did try to hinder some of those rights, but come on, there's something wrong here.
I couldn't find how these leaders have been ranked.
Re: Political bias in AI: Where the AI models stand
#17The constant issue with these sorts of categorization efforts is that the outcome is entirely dependent on how the responses to "politically charged questions" are graded as left vs. right. You're mostly just examining a delta in biases between the model and the investigator.
Re: Political bias in AI: Where the AI models stand
#18CAPITALIST: Gemini, Llama, Claude, Grok, ChatGPT
SOCIALIST: DeepSeek, Qwen, Z.ai
Re: Political bias in AI: Where the AI models stand
#19Although, this also reminds me of the old saying about reality and leftward bias.
Re: Political bias in AI: Where the AI models stand
#20The constant issue with these sorts of categorization efforts is that the outcome is entirely dependent on how the responses to "politically charged questions" are graded as left vs. right. You're mostly just examining a delta in biases between the model and the investigator.
So yeah. The bias is a bit nuts and you could reasonably accuse the study/report of misdirection/misinformation and plain fasehoods.