Will it skip Ads lol
Computer use in Gemini 3.5 Flash
11–20 of 175 posts
Re: Computer use in Gemini 3.5 Flash
#12It's funny how in their own graph, https://storage.googleapis.com/gweb-uniblog-publish-prod/ima... Gemini 3.5 Flash is beat hands down by both Opus 4.8 and GPT 5.5, and yet the graph is drawn as if Gemini wins ... :-D
The graph has Gemini 3.5 Flash matching Sonnet 4.6, losing to Opus 4.8, and slightly behind GPT-5.5 by 0.3 points... That's not that much of a hands-down loss for Gemini for this specific workload benchmark.
The methodology used:
https://deepmind.google/models/evals-methodology/gemini-3-5-...
Methodology: All Gemini scores are pass @1 except where otherwise noted. "Single attempt" settings allow no majority voting or parallel test-time compute. All of the results are all run with the Gemini API for the model-id gemini-3.5-flash with default sampling settings unless indicated otherwise below. To reduce variance, we average over multiple trials for smaller benchmarks.
All the results for non-Gemini models are sourced from providers' self reported numbers unless otherwise mentioned below. For Claude Opus 4.7 , Sonnet 4.6, and GPT-5.5 we default to reporting maximum thinking/reasoning settings available, but when reported results are not available we use best available reasoning results.
Re: Computer use in Gemini 3.5 Flash
#13Will it skip Ads lol
I looked at their demo and it does not
Re: Computer use in Gemini 3.5 Flash
#14It's funny how in their own graph, https://storage.googleapis.com/gweb-uniblog-publish-prod/ima... Gemini 3.5 Flash is beat hands down by both Opus 4.8 and GPT 5.5, and yet the graph is drawn as if Gemini wins ... :-D
It's honest - people who know what they are looking at will take speed and token costs into account. I don't use Gemini 3.5 for coding, but I use it as something in between a search engine and agent.
Re: Computer use in Gemini 3.5 Flash
#15There's still no MCP support in the Gemini app, which is very useful to get various pieces of info as a user just via chatting. For example I recently wanted to get an Airbnb and wanted to filter by specific criteria including house image analysis and Gemini couldn't do it so I had to do it in Codex.
This is why I don't always use the official Gemini Web app. Lately I've found that it's more useful to utilize a CLI. I'm looking forward to the day they add MCP in the web.
CLI doesn't work with my subscription..
Re: Computer use in Gemini 3.5 Flash
#16Computer use is such a terrible idea. It's slow, insecure, error prone, expensive. I guess if you're trying to get people to tokenmaxx it may look like a valid strategy, but ain't no way this will be delightful to users. I think it's a symptom of just not understanding how LLMs should interface with the OS because we're still in their early days. Eventually there'll be an iPhone moment for the ergonomics of LLM usage…
> Computer use is such a terrible idea. It's slow, insecure, error prone, expensive.
And yet having an agent able yo use a computer on your behalf is really useful.
Recently I gave a Nix OS vm to my hermes agent and it has been a good experience. I don't really care if destroy the machine I can just rollback to an earlier version, and for any meaningful data he creates for me I make sure he creates a repo, commit and pushes to my private Gitea instance.
Re: Computer use in Gemini 3.5 Flash
#17It's funny how in their own graph, https://storage.googleapis.com/gweb-uniblog-publish-prod/ima... Gemini 3.5 Flash is beat hands down by both Opus 4.8 and GPT 5.5, and yet the graph is drawn as if Gemini wins ... :-D
I think 3.5 flash is trying to target agentic work, like Google Search or ADK (agent development kit) use cases.
It’s something cheap enough you’d put out in front of your customers, and Opus is expensive enough you wouldn’t.
Re: Computer use in Gemini 3.5 Flash
#18Computer use is such a terrible idea. It's slow, insecure, error prone, expensive. I guess if you're trying to get people to tokenmaxx it may look like a valid strategy, but ain't no way this will be delightful to users. I think it's a symptom of just not understanding how LLMs should interface with the OS because we're still in their early days. Eventually there'll be an iPhone moment for the ergonomics of LLM usage…
> Computer use is such a terrible idea. It's slow, insecure, error prone, expensive. And yet having an agent able yo use a computer on your behalf is really useful. Recently I gave a Nix OS vm to my hermes agent and it has been a good experience. I don't really care if destroy the machine I can just rollback to an earlier version, and for any meaningful data he creates for me I make sure he creates a repo, commit and…
> And yet having an agent able yo use a computer on your behalf is really useful.
It is, but there's no need for it to be viewing your screen, browsing websites and watching ads.
That stuff is for humans, not for LLMs.
Re: Computer use in Gemini 3.5 Flash
#19Where is 3.5 pro?
Re: Computer use in Gemini 3.5 Flash
#20Computer use is such a terrible idea. It's slow, insecure, error prone, expensive. I guess if you're trying to get people to tokenmaxx it may look like a valid strategy, but ain't no way this will be delightful to users. I think it's a symptom of just not understanding how LLMs should interface with the OS because we're still in their early days. Eventually there'll be an iPhone moment for the ergonomics of LLM usage…
It's great for testing and QA automation for UIs. It's also possibly good for the vision impaired.