Live data from Hacker News

Under-16s to be banned from social media, Starmer announces

bbc.co.uk

11–20 of 118 posts

Re: Under-16s to be banned from social media, Starmer announces

#12

For any Australians who are already living with this, how's it going over there? Would you say the policy has been a success or not?

I did read a story about a mother and teen influencer who was moving to the UK because of the ban. I wonder how they're feeling.

Re: Under-16s to be banned from social media, Starmer announces

#14
post #6

It’s a failure of capitalism that one of the greatest educational resources in four generations (YouTube) gets walled off to those who need it most. I’d say shame on Google for letting shorts ruin this for the kids, or shame on the UK government for short-sightedness, but it’s pretty easy to see where both are coming from.

> one of the greatest educational resources in four generations (YouTube)

Depends. I struggle to follow video content, and do better with text. YMMV.

Re: Under-16s to be banned from social media, Starmer announces

#15
post #6

It’s a failure of capitalism that one of the greatest educational resources in four generations (YouTube) gets walled off to those who need it most. I’d say shame on Google for letting shorts ruin this for the kids, or shame on the UK government for short-sightedness, but it’s pretty easy to see where both are coming from.

my my nieces are always "how do you know so much" I then show them my playlist on youtube (veretassium, tomscott, redvsblue, pbs eons etc) they go back to scrolling though shorts right after. you can lead a horse to water but well...

Yes, but for the simile to work the horse has to be hooked on a special horse-feed lined with cocaine or something.

Admittedly children have ignored well meaning adults trying to educate them for all of history...

Re: Under-16s to be banned from social media, Starmer announces

#16
post #6

It’s a failure of capitalism that one of the greatest educational resources in four generations (YouTube) gets walled off to those who need it most. I’d say shame on Google for letting shorts ruin this for the kids, or shame on the UK government for short-sightedness, but it’s pretty easy to see where both are coming from.

It is super easy to see where this is coming from with youtube.

Speaking from experience: there is just no usable way to limit youtube to certain types of content, or disable "discovery" UI. Recommendation engine gravity is just too strong. Whatever useful kid/educational content they have is swamped by the ocean of attention sinks.

Shorts only made this worse.

Re: Under-16s to be banned from social media, Starmer announces

#17

Honest question: Is this about anything else than forcing all citizens to ID themselves to the government before using digital services?

Here's a random movie recommendation that has nothing at all to do with the above comment or the original link posted: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0405094

Re: Under-16s to be banned from social media, Starmer announces

#19

Honest question: Is this about anything else than forcing all citizens to ID themselves to the government before using digital services?

Have they said you’ll need to provide ID? My guess would be they do it through other mechanisms like age estimation. I know X is already doing this for posts labelled mature. If they do estimation through account age most people are probably already basically verified on lots of the main social media services.

Re: Under-16s to be banned from social media, Starmer announces

#20
Comes after certain ethnostates have the LOWEST popularity among young populations, and I'm certain this will help change that.

The Iran war was won online and it's been widely reported the young amoung the military had extreme low levels of morale which had an impact on the battlefield.

Social media is national security threat to our governments and colonialism needs it's foot soldiers.

Post reply on HN