11–20 of 213 posts
The article is so opaque in arriving at its conclusion; no prompts are disclosed, and nothing about the said simulation. What is stopping me from believing that you just put 'mandatory usage of nukes' in your system prompt?
The article is so opaque in arriving at its conclusion; no prompts are disclosed, and nothing about the said simulation. What is stopping me from believing that you just put 'mandatory usage of nukes' in your system prompt?
The article is so opaque in arriving at its conclusion; no prompts are disclosed, and nothing about the said simulation. What is stopping me from believing that you just put 'mandatory usage of nukes' in your system prompt?
This is just false. The article links to the 46-page paper [1] which lists full prompts in section E.2. [1] https://arxiv.org/pdf/2602.14740
FYI -- there's no such thing as a "tactical" nuke. A nuclear bomb is a nuclear bomb.
..Is what you are saying?
It's good when it becomes clear that a tool is dangerous in a certain way. Like it's good when people show you through their behavior that they can't be trusted Always use a sawstop if you have a circular saw and never trust an llm with any problem where ethics or trust is relevant.
Sawstops are expensive and they don't stop kickback, they are the power tool equivalent of alignment IMO. Don't forget your riving knife and if you don't learn proper technique, you're gonna have a bad time eventually. This applies to AI as well.