War Crimes Seem to Be Official US Policy Now
11–20 of 66 posts
Re: War Crimes Seem to Be Official US Policy Now
#12Earlier quoted context omitted.
Remember when America firebombed civilians during World War Two?
[flagged]
Re: War Crimes Seem to Be Official US Policy Now
#13Re: War Crimes Seem to Be Official US Policy Now
#14Re: War Crimes Seem to Be Official US Policy Now
#15The US certainly has a mixed track record here. But the culture of lawlessness in this administration is hard to overstate. Every crime committed by this regime is followed by a "what about" argument from a pundit, citing an example where someone in time, committed a vaguely similar offense. But no regime in US history did so many crimes so often. This is historically corrupt and criminal; everything else is disingen…
Re: War Crimes Seem to Be Official US Policy Now
#16Earlier quoted context omitted.
Remember when America firebombed civilians during World War Two?
[flagged]
Re: War Crimes Seem to Be Official US Policy Now
#17Earlier quoted context omitted.
Wasn’t regret for and fear of the scale of that damage partly why we supported the Geneva Convention?
Ever heard about Laos? "Between December of 1964 and March of 1973, the US launched more than 270 million cluster bombs on Laos during Operation Barrel Roll. This number is equivalent to dropping a full plane cargo load every 8 minutes, 24 hours a day, for 9 years. Laos is thus the most heavily bombed country in the world." "The legacy of this once secret war continues today. More than 80,000,000 undetonated bombs ar…
Re: War Crimes Seem to Be Official US Policy Now
#18It's their policy for decades. There is no bigger threat for world peace than US (and maybe Israel).
Re: War Crimes Seem to Be Official US Policy Now
#19It's called war crime only if you lost
Re: War Crimes Seem to Be Official US Policy Now
#20The US certainly has a mixed track record here. But the culture of lawlessness in this administration is hard to overstate. Every crime committed by this regime is followed by a "what about" argument from a pundit, citing an example where someone in time, committed a vaguely similar offense. But no regime in US history did so many crimes so often. This is historically corrupt and criminal; everything else is disingen…
For anyone who hasn't, I recommend reading up on Watergate and watching the resignation speech. It represents the kind of presidential conduct that a few decades ago was considered so abhorrent that the president should immediately resign over it.