this would.be a long term disaster for the us economy. you would have an unproductive or deflationay technology subsidized by the federal goverment. if ai raises productivity then it will be deflationary (making nominal gdp shrink). if ai does not raise productivity then you have a misallocation of capital backed by the federal government. instead the us should invest in things that actually would grow the economy, l…
> instead the us should invest in things thst actually would grow the economy, like cheap energy for one and basic r & d for two. Aren’t the big AI labs doing both those things?
Trump to meet AI leaders to discuss US investment in their companies
11–13 of 13 posts
Re: Trump to meet AI leaders to discuss US investment in their companies
#12I hate this for all the reasons, but given how much Americans hate their government is the government taking a steak in AI likely to improve people’s opinion of AI?
> is the government taking a steak in AI likely to improve people’s opinion of AI? Is this a claimed aim of the effort?
If I were China or Russia I would want the US to invest deeply in the AI boondogle meanwhile I make or mine the things that actually matter in the world. Its like the US vs USSR defense spending war in reverse. if rivals can dupe the US into wasting money on useless "ai" while they build cheap energy or make physical products.
Re: Trump to meet AI leaders to discuss US investment in their companies
#13I hate this for all the reasons, but given how much Americans hate their government is the government taking a steak in AI likely to improve people’s opinion of AI?
Can you name the reasons you hate it for? Genuine question
If these companies were in an earlier more precarious part of their research cycle, and if like multiple of his advisors and his VP weren’t industry insiders or paid by such I might be more in favor. But this is basically regulatory capture in steroids.
The economy is centralized in the magnificent ten enough.