There is no sense in which counterfeiting bank notes was a creative force in the economy and not just theft. The article doesn't really attempt to justify the title.
Fake Money Built America
11–20 of 22 posts
Re: Fake Money Built America
#12Re: Fake Money Built America
#13Re: Fake Money Built America
#14Sounds like a more traditional form of IOU to me. Which was a fairly widespread thing if I'm not mistaken?
Re: Fake Money Built America
#15No need to pretend that one particular group of people are that special.
Re: Fake Money Built America
#16Re: Fake Money Built America
#17fake stops being an applicable term as soon as people start agreeing to accept it, which the article says happened. Then it's as legitimate as anything like Bitcoin.
What would happen if all the people who agreed to accept it would also want to withdraw it from their accounts at the same time?
Re: Fake Money Built America
#18"In the first half of the 19th century, for example, the Midwest was so short of authentic banknotes that people knowingly accepted counterfeit ones." Sounds like a more traditional form of IOU to me. Which was a fairly widespread thing if I'm not mistaken?
Re: Fake Money Built America
#19To be clear, I don't like this outlook. But I've found it to be accurate to how people behave around money. It's not a sign of a healthy society.
Re: Fake Money Built America
#20Earlier quoted context omitted.
What would happen if all the people who agreed to accept it would also want to withdraw it from their accounts at the same time?
withdraw for what? for fiat(=fake) paper bills, or for similarly fake digits on a mobile app?