11–15 of 15 posts
> alleging that the company knowingly released and aggressively marketed ChatGPT to the public—including to children—while concealing serious risks, suppressing internal safety warnings, and deceiving Floridians about the true nature and dangers of the product. You can argue about whether a lawsuit is how this should be handled, but these are all easily-supported allegations.
> alleging that the company knowingly released and aggressively marketed ChatGPT to the public—including to children—while concealing serious risks, suppressing internal safety warnings, and deceiving Floridians about the true nature and dangers of the product. You can argue about whether a lawsuit is how this should be handled, but these are all easily-supported allegations.
So? They have a first amendment right to market their products.
> alleging that the company knowingly released and aggressively marketed ChatGPT to the public—including to children—while concealing serious risks, suppressing internal safety warnings, and deceiving Floridians about the true nature and dangers of the product. You can argue about whether a lawsuit is how this should be handled, but these are all easily-supported allegations.
So? They have a first amendment right to market their products.