11–20 of 45 posts
You should really remove the entire PDF of the book that you've shared on a public repo. No Starch Press is a gem and worth protecting.
That's the first edition (2019), not the second (2025). But both are in annas archive, anyway
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not to mention Adobe fixes PDF zero-day security bug that hackers have exploited for months https://techcrunch.com/2026/04/14/adobe-fixes-pdf-zero-day-security-bug-that-hackers-have-exploited-for-months/
Why is that relevant? Are you saying that this PDF is infected?
You should really remove the entire PDF of the book that you've shared on a public repo. No Starch Press is a gem and worth protecting.
That's the first edition (2019), not the second (2025). But both are in annas archive, anyway
If you see litter on the ground already, that doesn't make it OK to litter more.
the kind of post I internet for. A+. thank you
Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's the first edition (2019), not the second (2025). But both are in annas archive, anyway
"Someone else has pirated this, so it's OK for me to do it as well" isn't a good argument. If you see litter on the ground already, that doesn't make it OK to litter more.