Live data from Hacker News

UA flight – 'turn Bluetooth off or we're turning around'

old.reddit.com

11–20 of 40 posts

Re: UA flight – 'turn Bluetooth off or we're turning around'

#12

My guess is a device was named "Bomb" or something.

i like to make my hostname "virus" because it gets me a surprising number of check-in pings from network admins

I like to do that more subtly. If I want to have IT check on an ongoing engagement, I usually use Raspberry Pi based OUI/MAC addresses.

Other than that, I can recommend going for IoT devices like VOIP phone MAC addresses in conference rooms, because they're specifically allowlisted for everything and/or are in a different VLAN that doesn't block the endpoints.

Enterprise-grade security is always fun :D

Re: UA flight – 'turn Bluetooth off or we're turning around'

#13

"Wife is on the plane. Guy had a speaker named bomb. He just confessed to it. He said he named it forever ago and forgot about it. He’s 16 years old. Wife’s friend is sitting next to him as they are questioning him."

Man, looking forward to hear the phrase of "out of abundance of caution". What a fucking stupid overdose of caution and CYA.

Would an actual bomber actually name their device "Bomb"? Chances are, not.

Is the broadcast a "bomb threat"? If so, does it disappear if the device is switched off?

And if the continued broadcast is perceived to be an active threat, and it persisted even after they turned around, at what point do you say "Well, we haven't joined MH-17, might as well do another 180 and resume our flight"?

If the device was named "turn around or bomb", I'd be more convinced we have a situation.

God, I hate this world run by 5th graders.

Re: UA flight – 'turn Bluetooth off or we're turning around'

#14

"Wife is on the plane. Guy had a speaker named bomb. He just confessed to it. He said he named it forever ago and forgot about it. He’s 16 years old. Wife’s friend is sitting next to him as they are questioning him."

and he didn't think to turn off his speaker after the flight crew requested all BT devices to be turned off repeatedly?

or was it one of those in-ear headphones that are borderline impossible to turn off when outside of their case?

Re: UA flight – 'turn Bluetooth off or we're turning around'

#15

"Wife is on the plane. Guy had a speaker named bomb. He just confessed to it. He said he named it forever ago and forgot about it. He’s 16 years old. Wife’s friend is sitting next to him as they are questioning him."

What about the airport? Will they evacuate when they detect a Bluetooth called bomb? That will open so many pranks that can be remotely executed and impossible to detect.

Re: UA flight – 'turn Bluetooth off or we're turning around'

#16
From u/cupofmesideofyou

> For anyone seeking a legitimate source on the bluetooth device comments: you can listen to the KEWR Ramp/Company/Misc archive. Keep the date set to 2026-05-31 and the feed set to ramp/company/misc, but change the time to 0200-0230Z. Then, skip ahead to about 22:55

https://www.liveatc.net/archive.php?m=kewr_co

From ATC

> Do you guys know what happened with that - uh what is that a - 7-6 on the left?

> There's a security detail out there. Someone had a bluetooth they named a certain four letter word; so they have to inspect the whole aircraft including the cargo area. The passengers have to evacuate.

> That's crazy

Re: UA flight – 'turn Bluetooth off or we're turning around'

#17

"Wife is on the plane. Guy had a speaker named bomb. He just confessed to it. He said he named it forever ago and forgot about it. He’s 16 years old. Wife’s friend is sitting next to him as they are questioning him."

Man, looking forward to hear the phrase of "out of abundance of caution". What a fucking stupid overdose of caution and CYA. Would an actual bomber actually name their device "Bomb"? Chances are, not. Is the broadcast a "bomb threat"? If so, does it disappear if the device is switched off? And if the continued broadcast is perceived to be an active threat, and it persisted even after they turned around, at what point…

Do real bombs have bluetooth?

Re: UA flight – 'turn Bluetooth off or we're turning around'

#18

"Wife is on the plane. Guy had a speaker named bomb. He just confessed to it. He said he named it forever ago and forgot about it. He’s 16 years old. Wife’s friend is sitting next to him as they are questioning him."

Man, looking forward to hear the phrase of "out of abundance of caution". What a fucking stupid overdose of caution and CYA. Would an actual bomber actually name their device "Bomb"? Chances are, not. Is the broadcast a "bomb threat"? If so, does it disappear if the device is switched off? And if the continued broadcast is perceived to be an active threat, and it persisted even after they turned around, at what point…

Someone should make a list of all these weird overreactions. Didn't they turn one flight around because a passenger found something scribbled in Arabic script inside the inflight magazine (I think a previous passenger had written out a prayer)? And another one because there was an abandoned mobile phone that had presumably dropped out of someone's pocket?

Re: UA flight – 'turn Bluetooth off or we're turning around'

#20

"Wife is on the plane. Guy had a speaker named bomb. He just confessed to it. He said he named it forever ago and forgot about it. He’s 16 years old. Wife’s friend is sitting next to him as they are questioning him."

This will cause future pranksters to name their BT devices the same and cause the plane to panic.

Arghhh

Post reply on HN