I think we're all seeing a theme.
US's big bet on quantum computing may not be legal
11–20 of 123 posts
Re: US's big bet on quantum computing may not be legal
#12Re: US's big bet on quantum computing may not be legal
#13Re: US's big bet on quantum computing may not be legal
#14Re: US's big bet on quantum computing may not be legal
#15Re: US's big bet on quantum computing may not be legal
#16I think we're all seeing a theme.
Is the theme that any direction US tech advances in results in a persistent campaign of negative hit pieces aimed at trying to halt/destroy any achievements? Written by "journalists"/publishers that have never, and will never, say a single negative thing about china? Sure seems like that's the theme.
Re: US's big bet on quantum computing may not be legal
#17I think we're all seeing a theme.
Is the theme that any direction US tech advances in results in a persistent campaign of negative hit pieces aimed at trying to halt/destroy any achievements? Written by "journalists"/publishers that have never, and will never, say a single negative thing about china? Sure seems like that's the theme.
Re: US's big bet on quantum computing may not be legal
#18https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/us-soldier-charged-using-clas...
400.000$
So if these are all the Trump-voters then I am no longer surprised. It's an ongoing cash grab on different levels - the big guns play on top.
Re: US's big bet on quantum computing may not be legal
#19https://www.startribune.com/donald-trump-quantum-computing-i...
Re: US's big bet on quantum computing may not be legal
#20> "could argue that it has been harmed by the diversion of the funds to a different field. But that argument would likely take so long to sort out in court that all the money would have been spent by then." So if I steal from someone and spend it fast enough, I wouldn't be responsible anymore and can get away with it? That's how that sounded to me.