Today we reduced headcount by 22% / The goal is 100x output
11–14 of 14 posts
Re: Today we reduced headcount by 22% / The goal is 100x output
#12Earlier quoted context omitted.
They mention "million-dollar salary bands."
What was the original salary given a 100X increase in productivity? If they get a 50X salary, maybe 20K USD? Maybe I don’t understand how this works.
$60,000 * 10 * 10 =~ 10e6
Going from 60k to 600k to 6m. Probably won't be six million but maybe closer to 1m. A million a year is still "in the millions."Really doubt tens of millions, but at that point ICs could also be VCs.
Re: Today we reduced headcount by 22% / The goal is 100x output
#13Earlier quoted context omitted.
What was the original salary given a 100X increase in productivity? If they get a 50X salary, maybe 20K USD? Maybe I don’t understand how this works.
Five-digit salary times 100x hits a million: $60,000 * 10 * 10 =~ 10e6 Going from 60k to 600k to 6m. Probably won't be six million but maybe closer to 1m. A million a year is still "in the millions." Really doubt tens of millions, but at that point ICs could also be VCs.
Re: Today we reduced headcount by 22% / The goal is 100x output
#14Earlier quoted context omitted.
Five-digit salary times 100x hits a million: $60,000 * 10 * 10 =~ 10e6 Going from 60k to 600k to 6m. Probably won't be six million but maybe closer to 1m. A million a year is still "in the millions." Really doubt tens of millions, but at that point ICs could also be VCs.
50 times 20K is one million.