Live data from Hacker News

Mounting git commits as folders with NFS (2023)

jvns.ca

11–20 of 61 posts

Re: Mounting git commits as folders with NFS (2023)

#12

Nice idea. But when taking commits as folders one should delete, add and remame files in the folder and that is not possible in a commit because it creates another commit. So I think this is nit the right mental model

Files and folders can be read-only, a concept that has been around for about as long as the folders abstraction itself.

Re: Mounting git commits as folders with NFS (2023)

#13
post #4
post #3

FTA: “problem 1: webdav or NFS? The two filesystems I could that were natively supported by Mac OS were WebDav and NFS. I couldn’t tell which would be easier to implement so I just tried both” I might find out that it is incomplete, buggy or a nuisance to use, but FSKit ( https://developer.apple.com/documentation/FSKit ) would be my first choice.

macOS actually has an excellent SMB client, so the options actually are: WebDAV, NFS (3.0 and 4.0), SMB, FSKit.

AFAIK, SMB doesn't support symbolic links.

Re: Mounting git commits as folders with NFS (2023)

#14
post #7
post #4

Earlier quoted context omitted.

macOS actually has an excellent SMB client, so the options actually are: WebDAV, NFS (3.0 and 4.0), SMB, FSKit.

By excellent do you mean bearable? macOS’s SMB stack is certainly not excellent.

By bearable do you mean it exists? It's fucking shite.

Re: Mounting git commits as folders with NFS (2023)

#16
This is my favorite cursed finding: https://github.com/zevweiss/booze

FUSE-bindings for "filesystems in bash", eg:

https://github.com/zevweiss/booze/blob/master/cowsayfs.sh#L5...

    cs_read()
    {
      if ! [[ "$1" =~ ^/($cowpat)/[^/]+$ ]]; then
        booze_err=-$EINVAL
        return 1
      elif [ "$3" != 0 ]; then
        return 0
      fi

      local msg="${1#/*/}"
      local cow="${1#/}"
      cow="${cow%%/*}"
      cowsay -f "$cow" "$msg"
    }
...I think that WebDAV is "the way" compared to FUSE, but I'm always intrigued by the idea of virtual filesystems as an implementation face.

Re: Mounting git commits as folders with NFS (2023)

#17

NFS.. stop right there

You're being downvoted, but, seriously... NFS is a joke for anything outside of an enterprise setup with a bunch of ancillary support services in place.

The fact that NFSv4 has no concept of true "Authentication" and just blindly accepts whatever the client sends is the craziest network application design ever:

  Client: Hi, NFS server, I'm Bob! UID=1000
  Server: Hi Bob! Here's access to all of Bob's files! I trust you and don't need a password or anything!
  Client: Thanks!!!
Some of you may nitpick and say, "well ackkkuallyy, NFS supports authentication through GSSAPI/krb."

And to you, I say, that's crazy! Setting up Kerberos just to authenticate users for access to my Linux ISOs is a crazy large requirement! Sure, it might make sense for an enterprise that already uses Kerberos + LDAP + NFS + certificate management, but for everyone else, that's a lot of infrastructure to set up and maintain for what should be BASIC functionality.

EDIT

ALSO!!! Why the fork does NFS run as a kernel module (nfsd)!? Shouldn't that be an external daemon!? Who the heck thought any of this was a good idea!?

   
    Dev1: Here's a great idea! Let's run an insecure network server in Kernel space! 
    Dev2: OMG! You're so smart! Let's also exclude any encryption!!!
 
//end rant of an old, bitter Linux sysadmin

Re: Mounting git commits as folders with NFS (2023)

#18
post #7
post #4

Earlier quoted context omitted.

macOS actually has an excellent SMB client, so the options actually are: WebDAV, NFS (3.0 and 4.0), SMB, FSKit.

By excellent do you mean bearable? macOS’s SMB stack is certainly not excellent.

Won't the SMB implementation be sufficient to mount git commits as folders?

Re: Mounting git commits as folders with NFS (2023)

#19
post #17

NFS.. stop right there

You're being downvoted, but, seriously... NFS is a joke for anything outside of an enterprise setup with a bunch of ancillary support services in place. The fact that NFSv4 has no concept of true "Authentication" and just blindly accepts whatever the client sends is the craziest network application design ever: Client: Hi, NFS server, I'm Bob! UID=1000 Server: Hi Bob! Here's access to all of Bob's files! I trust you…

Does this mean that I can connect to an NFS server saying my UID=0 and get local root?

Re: Mounting git commits as folders with NFS (2023)

#20
post #19
post #17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You're being downvoted, but, seriously... NFS is a joke for anything outside of an enterprise setup with a bunch of ancillary support services in place. The fact that NFSv4 has no concept of true "Authentication" and just blindly accepts whatever the client sends is the craziest network application design ever: Client: Hi, NFS server, I'm Bob! UID=1000 Server: Hi Bob! Here's access to all of Bob's files! I trust you…

Does this mean that I can connect to an NFS server saying my UID=0 and get local root?

Usually, no. NFS defaults to "root_squash," which silently changes UID=0 to the UID of the `nfsnobody` user.

However, in the /etc/exports file, you can (but shouldn't) add the share option "no_root_squash" which disables that.

So, root access is slightly protected. But all other users are wide open.

Post reply on HN