HN discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48165492
Reverse engineering Android malware from popular Chinese projectors
11–20 of 20 posts
Re: Reverse engineering Android malware from popular Chinese projectors
#12Like many people, I've always been vaguely suspicious of IoT devices like these. But I've never seen reverse engineered what it is they actually do . The conclusion goes way beyond my expectations and is rather chilling: >My $35 projector wasn't just spying on me. It was selling my network. Anyone who paid Kookeey for proxy access could route their traffic through my IP
Re: Reverse engineering Android malware from popular Chinese projectors
#13Re: Reverse engineering Android malware from popular Chinese projectors
#14Re: Reverse engineering Android malware from popular Chinese projectors
#15Re: Reverse engineering Android malware from popular Chinese projectors
#16Re: Reverse engineering Android malware from popular Chinese projectors
#17Wow this is pretty insane, the whole supply chain of these things might look similar to the practises described in this article: https://www.chinatalk.media/p/how-to-buy-cheap-claude-tokens... HN discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48165492
Re: Reverse engineering Android malware from popular Chinese projectors
#18Is there any instructions on how I can do a similar analysis my own devices?
Re: Reverse engineering Android malware from popular Chinese projectors
#19This is the first time I've read an AI-heavy piece and stayed engaged with it all the way through. I think the author's sharing the prompts was key to that experience.
Re: Reverse engineering Android malware from popular Chinese projectors
#20This is the first time I've read an AI-heavy piece and stayed engaged with it all the way through. I think the author's sharing the prompts was key to that experience.
Author here. I didn't realize folks had found this, LOL. As some have noted, yes, large chunks of this article were AI-written. Whether or not it's truly justifiable, I was busy enough that I saw it as the best way to complete the capstone writing on my experience. Again, I'm mildly surprised folks came across it!
I think that the sorry thing about the article is that, even though I've read through an article of yours, I have learned nothing about what kind of person you are. I think that there's more to blogging than just showing the work. It's also a stage for you. The displays of character in the article ("I had a feeling", "I sat with that for a minute") written in first person are not actually yours, and are instead, in a way, a performance of the LLM that you used. So in my opinion (and you're free to disagree) you've robbed yourself of the attention you deserved.
However, I assume that the contents of the investigation were true, and if so, they are quite damning (in fact, my SO has just surprised me with a cheap Chinese projector. Nice timing!). It was also great that you've shared the prompts and results at each stage.