Overall it's not a problem for me if Bitwarden wants more money, but I have to draw the line at replacing top leadership with randoms from private equity and secret price hikes. I'm glad this is being highlighted and it's motivating me even more to find suitable FOSS-friendly alternative.
The quiet renovation at Bitwarden
11–20 of 333 posts
Re: The quiet renovation at Bitwarden
#12Re: The quiet renovation at Bitwarden
#13what are some bitwarden alternatives?
I left for Apples Passwords.app and never looked back. Of course, that has its own limitations if you are not bought into Apple's ecosystem.
Re: The quiet renovation at Bitwarden
#14Re: The quiet renovation at Bitwarden
#15Re: The quiet renovation at Bitwarden
#16what are some bitwarden alternatives?
All locally synced
There are sharing options but they are not really convenient, not a problem for me since I mostly don't share passwords
Re: The quiet renovation at Bitwarden
#17Re: The quiet renovation at Bitwarden
#18Not disputing the overall feeling about the changes at Bitwarden but "Always free" phrase is still actually there if you're creating a personal Free account.
Re: The quiet renovation at Bitwarden
#19I do share the concerns though. The change in leadership, the poor transparency, 100% price increase and the quiet change in core values.
I was happy paying $10 yearly for Bitwarden. I'm still okay with $20 but there's a seed of doubt.
Re: The quiet renovation at Bitwarden
#20I don't see the problem here. It's a great product and if they want to make money then I don't mind. If it's too expensive, and they hike the price to something ridiculous then I'll vote with my wallet.
The problem is the rug-pull. You can't go and proudly state "free forever", and then silently back down on that commitment. That is a textbook example for the enshittification cycle... lure users in with grand promises, sell out once you got enough of a following. (Well, technically, you can , but then don't complain about getting called out)