The post is AI-written, so I did not read it. But based on title and abstract I'll have to disagree. The native content LLMs understand is text. They were literally trained on it. They much prefer it to any arbitrary structure you could come up with. We're used to think computers prefer content that is structured and binary etc; but with LLMs that changed.
The crazy thing is that you can contribute literally nothing because you chose to be totally ignorant and only act on your perceived hobby horse.
And you're the same person who would tell me that ai is bad because, what? It might do the same thing you're proud you just did? Hallucinate some bs?