Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Autonomy misled HP about finances, Hewlett Packard says

bbc.co.uk

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

11–20 of 31 posts

Re: Autonomy misled HP about finances, Hewlett Packard says

#11

Post by j_col »

johneth wrote: post #8
j_col wrote: post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They only disclose it because they have to. What interests me is, what exactly is he doing with the BBC?

Their press release from 6 years ago: http://www.bbc.co.uk/pressoffice/pressreleases/stories/2006/... They seem to have a wide range of people from different backgrounds and industries. It's a non executive role, so I assume it's more for 'experience and wisdom' in their respective fields and expertise than anything else.

> It's a non executive role, so I assume it's more for 'experience and wisdom' in their respective fields and expertise than anything else.

He's clearly there to wield influence. What other possible reason?

Re: Autonomy misled HP about finances, Hewlett Packard says

#12

Post by johneth »

j_col wrote: post #11
johneth wrote: post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Their press release from 6 years ago: http://www.bbc.co.uk/pressoffice/pressreleases/stories/2006/... They seem to have a wide range of people from different backgrounds and industries. It's a non executive role, so I assume it's more for 'experience and wisdom' in their respective fields and expertise than anything else.

> It's a non executive role, so I assume it's more for 'experience and wisdom' in their respective fields and expertise than anything else. He's clearly there to wield influence. What other possible reason?

If he was there to wield influence, he's not done very well this time - otherwise why would the BBC report on possible foul play by his former company? Why would they explicitly mention his connection with the BBC?

Re: Autonomy misled HP about finances, Hewlett Packard says

#13

Post by j_col »

johneth wrote: post #12
j_col wrote: post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> It's a non executive role, so I assume it's more for 'experience and wisdom' in their respective fields and expertise than anything else. He's clearly there to wield influence. What other possible reason?

If he was there to wield influence, he's not done very well this time - otherwise why would the BBC report on possible foul play by his former company? Why would they explicitly mention his connection with the BBC?

> If he was there to wield influence, he's not done very well this time - otherwise why would the BBC report on possible foul play by his former company

Well it such a big story now, they can hardly not run with it can they?

> Why would they explicitly mention his connection with the BBC?

Again, because they have to. I find it fascinating that private industry leaders would be involved, non-executive or otherwise, in the running of a state broadcasting company. The BBC is spending British taxpayer's money after all. Does not seem impartial.

Re: Autonomy misled HP about finances, Hewlett Packard says

#14

Post by roc »

manishsharan wrote: post #3

Wasn't Autonomy a public company when HP acquired it ? Was it not the responsibility of HP board and management and their investment bankers to do due diligence before they made such a big acquisition ? Could it be that HP management , having lost the position of largest PC maker to Lenovo, is looking to throw our attention away from their incompetence.

Further along these lines, as a publicly traded company, isn't any cooking of the books a criminal act, regardless of the HP/sale angle?

Re: Autonomy misled HP about finances, Hewlett Packard says

#15

Post by robk »

This surely will hurt the reputation of Lynch. The other news reports have quotes saying in effect this was perpetrated by senior management and that the whistleblower who came forward is still at HP/Autonomy, which by inference seems to point a rather stern finger at Lynch.

Re: Autonomy misled HP about finances, Hewlett Packard says

#16

Post by rayiner »

ridruejo wrote: post #10

"We did a whole host of due diligence but when you're lied to, it's hard to find," Are you kidding me? That's the whole purpose of doing due diligence in the first place.

The purpose of due diligence is to uncover mistakes and ensure that the books are in order, not to uncover fraud or wrongdoing.

Re: Autonomy misled HP about finances, Hewlett Packard says

#17

Post by michaelt »

j_col wrote: post #6
benblack86 wrote: post #4

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If they hadn't disclosed that information, then I would see it as a problem.

They only disclose it because they have to. What interests me is, what exactly is he doing with the BBC?

Let's travel back in time to a few days ago, before these allegations emerged. Mike Lynch seemed like a guy who'd founded a high tech software company, let it grow, and sold it for billions of dollars. He's got an engineering PhD from a top university.

Over the last 10 years technology like the web, podcasts, home broadband, iPlayer etc have had a lot of impact on the BBC. It makes sense to have someone on the board who has an engineering background and experience managing complex technology projects.

Re: Autonomy misled HP about finances, Hewlett Packard says

#18

Post by politician »

masukomi wrote: post #7

I worked for a company that was Acquired by Autonomy. They made us fire a large portion of our staff before the final papers were signed so that they could continue with their claims that they never fired people as the result of an acquisition. Slimy Bastards if you ask me. This does not surprise me in the least.

It doesn't sound like your old company was all that principled either...

Re: Autonomy misled HP about finances, Hewlett Packard says

#19

Post by genwin »

rayiner wrote: post #16
ridruejo wrote: post #10

"We did a whole host of due diligence but when you're lied to, it's hard to find," Are you kidding me? That's the whole purpose of doing due diligence in the first place.

The purpose of due diligence is to uncover mistakes and ensure that the books are in order, not to uncover fraud or wrongdoing.

I have a hard time grasping this. If the books are in order, I wouldn't expect to later find significant fraud affecting the books. For example, if the books show $x in orders pending, I'd sample the orders to verify within some confidence level that the lot is worth $x.

Re: Autonomy misled HP about finances, Hewlett Packard says

#20

Post by chucknelson »

pisarzp wrote: post #5
manishsharan wrote: post #3

Wasn't Autonomy a public company when HP acquired it ? Was it not the responsibility of HP board and management and their investment bankers to do due diligence before they made such a big acquisition ? Could it be that HP management , having lost the position of largest PC maker to Lenovo, is looking to throw our attention away from their incompetence.

I agree. This story is quite hard to believe... Nobody spends $12bn without looking carefully into the books. There always is a long and thorough Due Diligence process on transactions like this one. Investment bankers, lawyers and accountants get get their fees mainly for going through every single document in the company...

Apparently Deloitte was supposed to do this, with KPMG as a safety net. It took a third (and also expensive) consulting firm (PwC) to notice issues.

I wonder if there will be any client fallout at either Deloitte or KPMG for this. Probably not...

Maybe HP is just trying to blame it on them? Who knows!

Post reply on HN