Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Two Home Affairs officials suspended after AI 'hallucinations' found

citizen.co.za

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

11–20 of 45 posts

Re: Two Home Affairs officials suspended after AI 'hallucinations' found

#11

Post by suprjami »

wewewedxfgdf wrote: post #3

The entire world sells products to encourage you to do your work with AI assistance. But god forbid that there should be any evidence of that in your .....work. You'll be suspended or fired. Holy god, it looks like someone used AI and were a bit sloppy in their editing!!!! YOU'RE FIRED! Maybe someday when there's been enough such reports people will shrug like they do about security breaches now.

These people are employed to serve the public and are paid by public funds. This is a socially critical job which affects people's entire lives, and in South Africa possibly their personal safety. This isn't just another coporation who needs to make line go up.

The wording of the article suggests that large parts of the documents where false and should have been caught by review, for which these two director-level people were responsible. This seems to be more than just editing which was "a bit sloppy".

I suggest if you were an immigrant whose citizenship application was denied based on an AI hallucination, forcing you to uproot and move your family out of the country against your will, you would not appreciate that and would take a different view.

Re: Two Home Affairs officials suspended after AI 'hallucinations' found

#13

Post by add-sub-mul-div »

embedding-shape wrote: post #7
wewewedxfgdf wrote: post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You're correct - whether you keep your job depends on how well you conceal that you used AI.

I don't think most people care if you used AI or not, as long as it's correct. AI or no AI, incorrect and false stuff makes people tired of you.

People who are paying even a slight bit of attention understand and anticipate the correlation between AI and slop/hallucination. There's a reason those terms have emerged. And there aren't corresponding terms for AI success/quality.

Re: Two Home Affairs officials suspended after AI 'hallucinations' found

#14

Post by Terr_ »

cwnyth wrote: post #4
wewewedxfgdf wrote: post #3

The entire world sells products to encourage you to do your work with AI assistance. But god forbid that there should be any evidence of that in your .....work. You'll be suspended or fired. Holy god, it looks like someone used AI and were a bit sloppy in their editing!!!! YOU'RE FIRED! Maybe someday when there's been enough such reports people will shrug like they do about security breaches now.

God forbid people actually have to do work and fact-check the hallucination machines!

Yes, but at the same time: "God forbid managers and executives actually permit people enough time to do do work and fact-check the hallucination machines." Especially in contexts where they are also mandating that staff find ways to use the hallucination machines.

Much like industrial accidents, some portion of blame has to go to the system, rather than any individual.

Re: Two Home Affairs officials suspended after AI 'hallucinations' found

#15

Post by delfinom »

wewewedxfgdf wrote: post #3

The entire world sells products to encourage you to do your work with AI assistance. But god forbid that there should be any evidence of that in your .....work. You'll be suspended or fired. Holy god, it looks like someone used AI and were a bit sloppy in their editing!!!! YOU'RE FIRED! Maybe someday when there's been enough such reports people will shrug like they do about security breaches now.

Wow, way to argue maliciously.

The only reason any AI usage is rejected in this scenario is due to errors.

Human error is one thing, but if a human uses AI and does not verify its output and then publishes it as some sort of authoritative work, you are pushing deep past ethical issues and often into legal issues.

Government word is law so government employees posting bad information from AI when it's their job to post good information is practically a crime in of itself.

Yes, humans can also publish information by mistake, but there's a massive difference between a human getting some numbers wrong vs. AI completely inventing citations.

My megacorp recently published their first AI usage policy, more or less, go nuts using AI but you will be 100% be held accountable for reviewing output to be acceptable, including but not limited to terminations.

Re: Two Home Affairs officials suspended after AI 'hallucinations' found

#16

Post by benjiro3000 »

embedding-shape wrote: post #7
wewewedxfgdf wrote: post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You're correct - whether you keep your job depends on how well you conceal that you used AI.

I don't think most people care if you used AI or not, as long as it's correct. AI or no AI, incorrect and false stuff makes people tired of you.

[dead]

Re: Two Home Affairs officials suspended after AI 'hallucinations' found

#18

Post by aussieguy1234 »

I would be totally unsurprising if corrupt politicians in developing countries start using AI extensively for basic governance.

What will be interesting is to see who does a better job. Corrupt politician by themselves, or the AI they outsource their job to.

Re: Two Home Affairs officials suspended after AI 'hallucinations' found

#20

Post by antonvs »

antonymoose wrote: post #12
antonvs wrote: post #6

[flagged]

Wait until you find out about IBM and Fanta!

Yes, I'm aware. But the point is not just that some businesses survived being Nazi-friendly - Hugo Boss is another example. The point is it's more unusual that a propaganda outlet whose entire purpose was to promote an evil regime survives that regime.
Post reply on HN