Live data from Hacker News

Back to the Mac: Parse Adds OS X Support

blog.parse.com

11–20 of 24 posts

Re: Back to the Mac: Parse Adds OS X Support

#11
They need to improve their site copy. I had no idea what it is after reading the homepage. It reads like a lot of BS to be frank. What about...

"Write full-featured mobile apps using our Android and iOS SDKs, we take care of the server-side"

Also, the site design feels too sparse and low on information.

The product sounds like a great idea though.

Re: Back to the Mac: Parse Adds OS X Support

#12

Parse sounds awesome. I'm learning iOS development atm... I definitely need to look into this. If you are to integrate it with a web app (like Instagram also is a webapp now), would you still use parse then? How would that work out?

You can use the JavaScript SDK[1] to build a webapp companion quite easily. This is how we implemented the mobile webapp version of our Anypic app[2]. Parse also has a REST API[3] which can be used from your web application backend of choice. [1]: https://parse.com/docs/js_guide [2]: https://anypic.org [3]: https://parse.com/docs/rest

Nice. Sounds like the REST way would be best, doesn't it? If you are using Rails at least.

Re: Back to the Mac: Parse Adds OS X Support

#14

They need to improve their site copy. I had no idea what it is after reading the homepage. It reads like a lot of BS to be frank. What about... "Write full-featured mobile apps using our Android and iOS SDKs, we take care of the server-side" Also, the site design feels too sparse and low on information. The product sounds like a great idea though.

I'm sure the reasoning is that the vagueness gets people talkin'.

Re: Back to the Mac: Parse Adds OS X Support

#15
post #14

They need to improve their site copy. I had no idea what it is after reading the homepage. It reads like a lot of BS to be frank. What about... "Write full-featured mobile apps using our Android and iOS SDKs, we take care of the server-side" Also, the site design feels too sparse and low on information. The product sounds like a great idea though.

I'm sure the reasoning is that the vagueness gets people talkin' .

I doubt it very much. It is sometimes difficult to explain something you spend all your time thinking about to a third party- because you rarely have to ask yourself "what is this in ten words or less", you're not well practised at it.

Re: Back to the Mac: Parse Adds OS X Support

#16
post #2

When I read the "About Parse" page I read this, I can't quite work out what Parse exactly is, why I would use it, and how I would benefit from it. Here's what I read: "Parse is transforming the way mobile applications store, sync, and push data. Our vision is a world where mobile developers never have to develop, deploy, or maintain their own server-side stack. Our simple but powerful native mobile SDKs provide all t…

The sense I get is more or less that they're providing push/storage capabilities similar to what Apple provides via iCloud. The critical differences are that:

- It's cross-platform. You can use it for Android / Windows / Linux / web apps, not just iOS and OS X apps.

- It doesn't have some of the restrictions that iCloud does (e.g, App Store distribution for Mac OS X apps).

They also add some extra functionality on top of built-in OS functionality -- for instance, they've got some utilities for simplifying in-app purchases on iOS / OS X.

Re: Back to the Mac: Parse Adds OS X Support

#17
post #2

When I read the "About Parse" page I read this, I can't quite work out what Parse exactly is, why I would use it, and how I would benefit from it. Here's what I read: "Parse is transforming the way mobile applications store, sync, and push data. Our vision is a world where mobile developers never have to develop, deploy, or maintain their own server-side stack. Our simple but powerful native mobile SDKs provide all t…

Skim the API docs -- that's what got me to actually understand Parse.

It's an extremely full-featured, full-stack platform. Think a less-general Heroku. The API makes it look kind of like MongoDB + blob storage + push notifications, but with really nice abstractions for things like account management.

It also has a "Cloud Code" feature that can store and execute custom JavaScript server-side on their end.

Re: Back to the Mac: Parse Adds OS X Support

#18
post #13

Parse is growing and adding new features really fast, it's also dead simple to use, I love it, too bad they are not reliable, they need to improve their stability and offer better uptime.

> they need to improve their stability and offer better uptime

What's their track record here?

Re: Back to the Mac: Parse Adds OS X Support

#19
post #13

Parse is growing and adding new features really fast, it's also dead simple to use, I love it, too bad they are not reliable, they need to improve their stability and offer better uptime.

I use Parse for several high-usage apps, both iOS and web apps, and have never had a problem. I log every single connection error to analytics, and see very few problems.

Re: Back to the Mac: Parse Adds OS X Support

#20
post #15
post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm sure the reasoning is that the vagueness gets people talkin' .

I doubt it very much. It is sometimes difficult to explain something you spend all your time thinking about to a third party- because you rarely have to ask yourself "what is this in ten words or less", you're not well practised at it.

I don't believe for a second that for all the attention Parse has received, the idea of an elevator pitch has never come up.
Post reply on HN