Live data from Hacker News

Notepad++ Code Editor Comes to Mac After 20-Year Wait

macrumors.com

11–20 of 38 posts

Re: Notepad++ Code Editor Comes to Mac After 20-Year Wait

#12
>The only difference is that the menus, dialogs, file pickers, keyboard shortcuts, and windowing all use native macOS Cocoa APIs.

Why would I want native macOS dialogs where the save as dialog can only show 32 characters on the screen at once? I use LibreOffice on Mac mostly because it allows me to use their dialogs instead of the crap macOS ones...

Re: Notepad++ Code Editor Comes to Mac After 20-Year Wait

#13
post #6

Wow! As a heavy Notepad++ on Windows I am really happy. I haven't found anything to replace Notepad++ on Mac for me.

Sublime Text. The elder and chief of them all. The inspirer.

Bbedit is better than Sublime and is arguably more refined.

I use it and Bbedit and vi.

Re: Notepad++ Code Editor Comes to Mac After 20-Year Wait

#14
post #6

Wow! As a heavy Notepad++ on Windows I am really happy. I haven't found anything to replace Notepad++ on Mac for me.

Sublime Text. The elder and chief of them all. The inspirer.

"The inspirer" huh? So Sublime Text went back in time 5 years and inspired Notepad++?

Re: Notepad++ Code Editor Comes to Mac After 20-Year Wait

#15
This story is so irresponsible.

>> Notepad++ for macOS is maintained by Andrey Letov, who wrote the Objective-C++ Cocoa UI that replaces Notepad++'s Win32 front-end. The app is available to download from the Notepad++ website.

That is not the Notepad++ website! It's some other website. I understand that this is a fairly legitimate and professional port. But this framing is unacceptable. It's especially grating considering "Notepad++" is trademarked in France: https://data.inpi.fr/marques/FR5133202 [1]. The software is GPL but that doesn't mean you can slap the trademark on any derived codebase - legally problematic in France, but it's disrespectful worldwide. The Mac port really should have been released under a similar but clearly distinct name, and MacRumors should have been way more responsible about framing the story.

[1] via https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47917939

Re: Notepad++ Code Editor Comes to Mac After 20-Year Wait

#16

>The only difference is that the menus, dialogs, file pickers, keyboard shortcuts, and windowing all use native macOS Cocoa APIs. Why would I want native macOS dialogs where the save as dialog can only show 32 characters on the screen at once? I use LibreOffice on Mac mostly because it allows me to use their dialogs instead of the crap macOS ones...

One big reason is sandboxing - the native dialogs can view the entire filesystem hierarchy and automatically grant access to selected resources to the calling app. Non-native dialogs are restricted to whatever the app has access to, which means you often have to give the apps Full Disk Access to make them work properly.

Re: Notepad++ Code Editor Comes to Mac After 20-Year Wait

#17

Yeah, that's not gonna hit. Non-native UI in an app that no Mac plain-text user asked for. I love Sublime, but TextMate was once king. There are already plenty of good options. I also love VIM for saving test to specific locations while I'm on the command line (I have an `sb` alias for Sublime but I don't want to switch away from my terminal window unless the corpus is large or complex).

[flagged]

Re: Notepad++ Code Editor Comes to Mac After 20-Year Wait

#18

This was on HN a few days ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47916964 , and there it was mentioned that it is __not__ an official port and has nothing to do with the original Notepad++ author!

And domain is different than original Notepad++, now it makes sense.

Re: Notepad++ Code Editor Comes to Mac After 20-Year Wait

#19
post #18

This was on HN a few days ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47916964 , and there it was mentioned that it is __not__ an official port and has nothing to do with the original Notepad++ author!

And domain is different than original Notepad++, now it makes sense.

Different yet similar enough to make it seem legit at first. The only "giveaway" for me was the website looking like any other vibecoded SaaS website. Not a good sign for me personally.
Post reply on HN