Live data from Hacker News

GitHub Copilot is moving to usage-based billing

github.blog

11–20 of 583 posts

Re: GitHub Copilot is moving to usage-based billing

#11
post #7
post #3

There is noticeable trend across all agentic coding platforms that this situation is no longer sustainable. With this kind of pricing (sonnet 4.6 has 9x multiplier, previously 1x) it begs the question why use Copilot to begin with. You could easily just buy the tokens directly and have a lot more choice as well.

Doesn't GitHub get volume discounting they can pass on to their Copilot customers?

[dead]

Re: GitHub Copilot is moving to usage-based billing

#12
post #7
post #3

There is noticeable trend across all agentic coding platforms that this situation is no longer sustainable. With this kind of pricing (sonnet 4.6 has 9x multiplier, previously 1x) it begs the question why use Copilot to begin with. You could easily just buy the tokens directly and have a lot more choice as well.

Doesn't GitHub get volume discounting they can pass on to their Copilot customers?

Looking at their pricing it does not look the case.

Re: GitHub Copilot is moving to usage-based billing

#14
post #3

There is noticeable trend across all agentic coding platforms that this situation is no longer sustainable. With this kind of pricing (sonnet 4.6 has 9x multiplier, previously 1x) it begs the question why use Copilot to begin with. You could easily just buy the tokens directly and have a lot more choice as well.

One reason I used it was that I wasn't locked into a single provider and switching them was as easy as changing a drop-down. Small feature? Sonnet or GPT5.4/mini? Large changes? Opus. And why not see how good Raptor Mini does this one refactor?

It also helped build an intuition of what wach model could do and which parts it was weaker at because you could try them almost side by side, especially if one model's output wasn't great.

That said, these were all side projects so nothing truly consequential. Otoh, you might leave some extra perf on the table but I found the models worked quite with the Copilot harness.

Re: GitHub Copilot is moving to usage-based billing

#15
post #7
post #3

There is noticeable trend across all agentic coding platforms that this situation is no longer sustainable. With this kind of pricing (sonnet 4.6 has 9x multiplier, previously 1x) it begs the question why use Copilot to begin with. You could easily just buy the tokens directly and have a lot more choice as well.

Doesn't GitHub get volume discounting they can pass on to their Copilot customers?

Economics of scale don't work when scale still isn't enough and capacity is still limited.

GitHub has the full power of Azure with their hosted models but it's not being passed to consumers.

Re: GitHub Copilot is moving to usage-based billing

#16
post #7
post #3

There is noticeable trend across all agentic coding platforms that this situation is no longer sustainable. With this kind of pricing (sonnet 4.6 has 9x multiplier, previously 1x) it begs the question why use Copilot to begin with. You could easily just buy the tokens directly and have a lot more choice as well.

Doesn't GitHub get volume discounting they can pass on to their Copilot customers?

It seems to me more expensive but I might be reading it wrong.

Re: GitHub Copilot is moving to usage-based billing

#17
Well.

Just got an email from GitHub saying they'll be raising prices for Co Pilot.

"To keep up with the way you use Copilot, we're transitioning to usage-based billing, and we want to give you enough time to prepare."

Man, it was fun. Having my tokens subsidized by Microsoft. If the prices go up to much I guess I'll try Deepseek again.

Re: GitHub Copilot is moving to usage-based billing

#19
post #5

"Your plan pricing is unchanged: Copilot Pro remains $10/month and Pro+ remains $39/month, and each includes $10 and $39 in monthly AI Credits, respectively." If there's no discount on credits (in terms of tokens per dollar) over other providers, I'm going to switch to a PAYG provider. If there's a month where there's little to no coding I can pocket the 10$. What incentive do they give to stay with this plan?

This was my first thought too. "Oh cool, I should be seeing lower prices" as I don't use Co-pilot that often anymore. But no, that's not the case. It rather served to remind me that I should probably just cancel.
Post reply on HN