There is noticeable trend across all agentic coding platforms that this situation is no longer sustainable. With this kind of pricing (sonnet 4.6 has 9x multiplier, previously 1x) it begs the question why use Copilot to begin with. You could easily just buy the tokens directly and have a lot more choice as well.
Doesn't GitHub get volume discounting they can pass on to their Copilot customers?
GitHub Copilot is moving to usage-based billing
11–20 of 583 posts
Re: GitHub Copilot is moving to usage-based billing
#12There is noticeable trend across all agentic coding platforms that this situation is no longer sustainable. With this kind of pricing (sonnet 4.6 has 9x multiplier, previously 1x) it begs the question why use Copilot to begin with. You could easily just buy the tokens directly and have a lot more choice as well.
Doesn't GitHub get volume discounting they can pass on to their Copilot customers?
Re: GitHub Copilot is moving to usage-based billing
#13Re: GitHub Copilot is moving to usage-based billing
#14There is noticeable trend across all agentic coding platforms that this situation is no longer sustainable. With this kind of pricing (sonnet 4.6 has 9x multiplier, previously 1x) it begs the question why use Copilot to begin with. You could easily just buy the tokens directly and have a lot more choice as well.
It also helped build an intuition of what wach model could do and which parts it was weaker at because you could try them almost side by side, especially if one model's output wasn't great.
That said, these were all side projects so nothing truly consequential. Otoh, you might leave some extra perf on the table but I found the models worked quite with the Copilot harness.
Re: GitHub Copilot is moving to usage-based billing
#15There is noticeable trend across all agentic coding platforms that this situation is no longer sustainable. With this kind of pricing (sonnet 4.6 has 9x multiplier, previously 1x) it begs the question why use Copilot to begin with. You could easily just buy the tokens directly and have a lot more choice as well.
Doesn't GitHub get volume discounting they can pass on to their Copilot customers?
GitHub has the full power of Azure with their hosted models but it's not being passed to consumers.
Re: GitHub Copilot is moving to usage-based billing
#16There is noticeable trend across all agentic coding platforms that this situation is no longer sustainable. With this kind of pricing (sonnet 4.6 has 9x multiplier, previously 1x) it begs the question why use Copilot to begin with. You could easily just buy the tokens directly and have a lot more choice as well.
Doesn't GitHub get volume discounting they can pass on to their Copilot customers?
Re: GitHub Copilot is moving to usage-based billing
#17Just got an email from GitHub saying they'll be raising prices for Co Pilot.
"To keep up with the way you use Copilot, we're transitioning to usage-based billing, and we want to give you enough time to prepare."
Man, it was fun. Having my tokens subsidized by Microsoft. If the prices go up to much I guess I'll try Deepseek again.
Re: GitHub Copilot is moving to usage-based billing
#18Re: GitHub Copilot is moving to usage-based billing
#19"Your plan pricing is unchanged: Copilot Pro remains $10/month and Pro+ remains $39/month, and each includes $10 and $39 in monthly AI Credits, respectively." If there's no discount on credits (in terms of tokens per dollar) over other providers, I'm going to switch to a PAYG provider. If there's a month where there's little to no coding I can pocket the 10$. What incentive do they give to stay with this plan?
Re: GitHub Copilot is moving to usage-based billing
#20 Opus 4.6 3x -> 27x
Opus 4.7 3x -> 27x
GPT 5.4 1x -> 6x
EDIT: only applies to annual plans