Live data from Hacker News

Claude Code Removed from $20-a-Month "Pro" Subscription for New Users

wheresyoured.at

11–20 of 40 posts

Re: Claude Code Removed from $20-a-Month "Pro" Subscription for New Users

#11
post #5

This should be a warning to those who feel that it's ok to offload your creativity to a subscription service. Always need a local model in some form.

The 'local model' is called your brain.

I’m sorry but that’s just dumb. An LLM is a tool. Your brain is not a substitute for an LLM in the same way your fingers are not a substitute for a wrench.

The year is 2026 and if you are using your brain on chore work like one-off scripts, refactoring, boilerplate test code, then you are wasting time and money and I don’t want to work with you.

Local models are fine for this and can do it in a fraction of the time your brain will take to even get bootstrapped

Re: Claude Code Removed from $20-a-Month "Pro" Subscription for New Users

#12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Are there local models that are anywhere near as good at coding as opus 4.6?

People will insist otherwise, but I haven't seen anything close to sonnet 4.6 that can be run locally.

I don't think anyone can honestly say a huge frontier model is actually going to be matched by something running on 64gb locally?

Re: Claude Code Removed from $20-a-Month "Pro" Subscription for New Users

#13

Earlier quoted context omitted.

People will insist otherwise, but I haven't seen anything close to sonnet 4.6 that can be run locally.

I don't think anyone can honestly say a huge frontier model is actually going to be matched by something running on 64gb locally?

I have read many comments saying Qwen3.5 various ~30B models, Gemma 4 ~30B models and now Qwen3.6 "better than sonnet".

I don't know how large sonnet and opus are but the rumor is 1T and 5T respectively.

Re: Claude Code Removed from $20-a-Month "Pro" Subscription for New Users

#14

This should be a warning to those who feel that it's ok to offload your creativity to a subscription service. Always need a local model in some form.

There is very little vendor lock. We can keep using subsidized model until it’s not. Then switch to next subsidized model.

Re: Claude Code Removed from $20-a-Month "Pro" Subscription for New Users

#15
post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The 'local model' is called your brain.

I’m sorry but that’s just dumb. An LLM is a tool. Your brain is not a substitute for an LLM in the same way your fingers are not a substitute for a wrench. The year is 2026 and if you are using your brain on chore work like one-off scripts, refactoring, boilerplate test code, then you are wasting time and money and I don’t want to work with you. Local models are fine for this and can do it in a fraction of the time y…

The year is 2026 the average RAM for the most common type of developer’s (web) machine is 16GB. 8 will be the lower end. Tell me which model can one run on this machine locally?

Re: Claude Code Removed from $20-a-Month "Pro" Subscription for New Users

#16

This should be a warning to those who feel that it's ok to offload your creativity to a subscription service. Always need a local model in some form.

There is very little vendor lock. We can keep using subsidized model until it’s not. Then switch to next subsidized model.

It's like chairs!

Re: Claude Code Removed from $20-a-Month "Pro" Subscription for New Users

#17
post #6

This should be a warning to those who feel that it's ok to offload your creativity to a subscription service. Always need a local model in some form.

You could judge the costs of the AI products you're using by the standard API pricing, not promotional subscription offers.

Not even that way, given that the price is still highly subsidized by investors and circular deals.
Post reply on HN