The 'manifesto' reads very much like it was written by someone who is on Twitter way too much, and considers quote tweets to be public harrassment.
Perhaps it is AI generated or semi-AI generated? I stopped using Twitter when that right-arm raising guy took over; to me the whole website appears to have been AI generated. Perhaps I am wrong.
The 'manifesto' reads very much like it was written by someone who is on Twitter way too much, and considers quote tweets to be public harrassment.
I felt like nothing gives away their disconnect from reality as much as feeling comfortable interrupting their wildly anti-human, anti non-wealthy rant to scream, "LEAVE ELON ALONE!" It was a tantrum posted as manifesto. The NYT Best Seller list has always been manipulable; I definitely have questions about this Turner Diaries/ Unabomber rant appearing on it.
I'm not edgy and cool enough to understand this website.
All of the poster’s previous attempts had been flagged to death but this one apparently aligns better with the prevailing sentiment.
Those flags were strangely funny to me.
We posted our open source privacy tool. A flag.
We posted a "Forensic analysis of the RLHF supply chain: The $2/HR labor behind AI alignment." A flag. :)
Even our "In Memoriam: Jason Snitker, a.k.a. Parmaster. RIP Legend" was flagged!?
Etc.
So is this AI generated? My assumption was yes so I skipped it. Either way I think this actually makes it harder to analyse Palantir's wrongdoings any any potential flow of money into lobbyists. Having a flashy website isn't a substitute for real analysis. I miss the 1990s a bit; there used to be elderly folks who did not know much about HTML/CSS, but they were real, no AI autogenerating slop there. I can't even tell…
Why would you assume so? The author is critiquing notorious AI maximalist.