Live data from Hacker News

Founders Need to Be Ruthless When Chasing Deals

steveblank.com

11–20 of 32 posts

Re: Founders Need to Be Ruthless When Chasing Deals

#11
post #5

This is great advice (that we need to follow) but needs to be updated for 2026. The information value of providing (or receiving) a demo has dropped to roughly zero with vibe coding. Today, an apparently functional and useful product can be produced and demoed in minutes, but that demo provides absolutely zero information into the technical capabilities of the demoing team to follow through on promises with polish an…

In my experience demos are half about the product and half about the team / company behind it. So I wouldn’t call its value zero: part of the reason a potential client is asking for a demo is to see if there’s actually a real, intelligent company behind the product.

Re: Founders Need to Be Ruthless When Chasing Deals

#13

I wish hackernews submissions is more like this

What would you mean "more like this"?

The headline is borderline clickbaity. Specifically the word "Ruthless" made me think of something unethical like Delve's business.

[1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47634690

Re: Founders Need to Be Ruthless When Chasing Deals

#14
post #5

This is great advice (that we need to follow) but needs to be updated for 2026. The information value of providing (or receiving) a demo has dropped to roughly zero with vibe coding. Today, an apparently functional and useful product can be produced and demoed in minutes, but that demo provides absolutely zero information into the technical capabilities of the demoing team to follow through on promises with polish an…

> The information value of providing (or receiving) a demo has dropped to roughly zero with vibe coding.

Only if you're a software-only startup. If you have hardware, the entire article is still valid.

Re: Founders Need to Be Ruthless When Chasing Deals

#15

>We’re excited. When can you come back and show us a prototype?” When you've put your hand in your pocket.

>> We’re excited. When can you come back and show us a prototype?”

> When you've put your hand in your pocket.

I thought the same thing. From my reading of "The Mom Test", my sales strategy changed to incorporate the lies that a business would tell you to avoid hurting your feelings.

Basically, if you cannot give me a purchase order after seeing the software, you don't want it!

I do like the idea of a cancellable purchase order that they sign: organisations need an earthquake to move them sometimes. Once that thing is approved and signed by the powers that be, absolutely no one in that org is going to bother cancelling it and going with a competitor.

Re: Founders Need to Be Ruthless When Chasing Deals

#16
post #5

This is great advice (that we need to follow) but needs to be updated for 2026. The information value of providing (or receiving) a demo has dropped to roughly zero with vibe coding. Today, an apparently functional and useful product can be produced and demoed in minutes, but that demo provides absolutely zero information into the technical capabilities of the demoing team to follow through on promises with polish an…

Right, and the story now shifts to: What's your customer service & support model? How can you prove this is stable and that you can maintain it? Who is going to handle the pages in the middle of the night?

All those things are beyond the demo itself. Vibe-coded demos are just demos. There are stability, security and everything enterprise that still needs to be added to a demo to actually make it functional as a paid offering.

The hard problems still remain.

Re: Founders Need to Be Ruthless When Chasing Deals

#17
post #7

>We’re excited. When can you come back and show us a prototype?” When you've put your hand in your pocket.

What do you mean by that? Promise some investment? Commit to something?

> What do you mean by that? Promise some investment? Commit to something?

Commitment, in any form. Best is a signature on a purchase order.

The Mom Test is a good explanation of why you don't have PMF with the client until you receive a purchase order.

In short, people don't want to tell you things that hurt your feelings, especially if you're a good sales person (good sales people are likeable, you aren't closing if the client doesn't like you).

So you're sitting their with the clients team, and they like you, you made a good impression. No one wants to tell you "Look, it's not what we want, it's best you be on your way". What they'll do instead is:

1. Try to soften the blow with "We like it but we have to get sign-off from $VP first" (blame it on the non-present Big Bad Wolf); you tell them "Can we pull them in now? How about tomorrow?"

2. "Don't have the budget but we'll put it in the upcoming budget in a few months" (Hoping you won't know on their door again in 4 months); You tell them fine, we can sign now for deployment in a few months, before the rates increase you will have in a few months, and you'll throw in a discount as well.

3. "Can it do $X, $Y and $X" (Hoping you'll say "No" and then bugger off); you tell them they can make $X, $Y and $Z part of the signed purchase order.

4. "We have a lot of projects going on now, don't have capacity to manage this" (Hoping, again, you'll bugger off and forget to come back); this is one you don't respond to, you just back off because they don't need your product that badly.

If a business wants what you are selling, you will have a signed purchase order the next day. If you don't get that signed PO, you follow up over the course of maybe a month. After that you spend your limited sales resources on someone else.

Once, I spoke telephonically with an (existing) client in the morning on an upsell, and had their signed purchase order about two hours later. Fair enough, this was an existing client, but the upsell was for a completely new product.

My rule of thumb is "demo once, and record the demo". If higher ups need to see a demo before they okay, they can see the video. If the demo was not to the correct group, the correct group can see the demo (and they'll request another demo if they want one, the existing group won't ask for another demo without new participants).

Look, sales means you do more work than the client, but they still have some work to do, and if they don't do it then they're not committed.

Re: Founders Need to Be Ruthless When Chasing Deals

#18
post #5

This is great advice (that we need to follow) but needs to be updated for 2026. The information value of providing (or receiving) a demo has dropped to roughly zero with vibe coding. Today, an apparently functional and useful product can be produced and demoed in minutes, but that demo provides absolutely zero information into the technical capabilities of the demoing team to follow through on promises with polish an…

In my experience demos are half about the product and half about the team / company behind it. So I wouldn’t call its value zero: part of the reason a potential client is asking for a demo is to see if there’s actually a real, intelligent company behind the product.

AI demos are 5% of the product

Re: Founders Need to Be Ruthless When Chasing Deals

#19
The described enterprise sales process sounds a bit odd to me. I come from the perspective of existing codebase that is tailored to the specific customer processes/org structure etc. so maybe it's different for a completely blue ocean type of product.

It's usually initial contact + demo or feature talk of sorts. The next step is some small project with customer specific data which is billed. They get a quote and either do it or don't. Scale up, SLA etc. follow after that (basic outline of what's possible is usually given in the initial contact). Alternatively this small project can be some consulting package but it's always billed.

Post reply on HN