Live data from Hacker News

Book review: There Is No Antimemetics Division

stephendiehl.com

11–20 of 243 posts

Re: Book review: There Is No Antimemetics Division

#12

I wonder if this is for the rewrite or the first version. I read the first version and thought the first half was good and that the second half felt clunky. To the point where i don’t recommend it to anyone (not a huge negative, there’s just better books out there).

I had the opposite reaction. The second half was garbage, but the first half was so good and original I'd recommend it just for that.

Same! I just finished the book a few days ago. The first half is really good, a cool premise and interesting story. The second half just got a bit too weird for me and by the final chapter I was happy it was finished lol.

Re: Book review: There Is No Antimemetics Division

#13

Good timing, the Kindle version is $1.99 right now.

Please don't 'buy' digital items from Amazon, because you won't actually own them. Pay extra, support your local bookshop and get a physical copy which you will actually own.

This disregards the benefit of a single device that is easy to carry. Love where this is come from so maybe do both if you can.

Re: Book review: There Is No Antimemetics Division

#14

Good timing, the Kindle version is $1.99 right now.

Please don't 'buy' digital items from Amazon, because you won't actually own them. Pay extra, support your local bookshop and get a physical copy which you will actually own.

Amazon allows EPUB downloads for publishers that have chosen to go DRM-free.

Re: Book review: There Is No Antimemetics Division

#16

Good timing, the Kindle version is $1.99 right now.

Please don't 'buy' digital items from Amazon, because you won't actually own them. Pay extra, support your local bookshop and get a physical copy which you will actually own.

I'm more interested in rewarding utility because that gives me better things.

Re: Book review: There Is No Antimemetics Division

#17

I wonder if this is for the rewrite or the first version. I read the first version and thought the first half was good and that the second half felt clunky. To the point where i don’t recommend it to anyone (not a huge negative, there’s just better books out there).

The rewrite is excellent

Re: Book review: There Is No Antimemetics Division

#18

I wonder if this is for the rewrite or the first version. I read the first version and thought the first half was good and that the second half felt clunky. To the point where i don’t recommend it to anyone (not a huge negative, there’s just better books out there).

I had the opposite reaction. The second half was garbage, but the first half was so good and original I'd recommend it just for that.

> the first half was good and that the second half felt clunky

> The second half was garbage, but the first half was so good

so you had the same reaction?

Re: Book review: There Is No Antimemetics Division

#19

I wonder if this is for the rewrite or the first version. I read the first version and thought the first half was good and that the second half felt clunky. To the point where i don’t recommend it to anyone (not a huge negative, there’s just better books out there).

The author’s other stories like Ra and Fine Structure have the same issue, in my opinion. He has interesting ideas, but cannot seem to write an ending.
Post reply on HN