Amazon is adding a fuel surcharge to fees it collects from third-party sellers
11–20 of 120 posts
Re: Amazon is adding a fuel surcharge to fees it collects from third-party sellers
#12Re: Amazon is adding a fuel surcharge to fees it collects from third-party sellers
#13Earlier quoted context omitted.
What percentage of overall vehicular fuel use does junk mail (from inception to landfill) constitute, might you suppose?
If the majority of mail stops are junk mail only, I would love to see some napkin math of the effect of all those diesel/gasoline accelerations per mailbox, dropped across the daily fleet of drop offs.
Re: Amazon is adding a fuel surcharge to fees it collects from third-party sellers
#14Earlier quoted context omitted.
What percentage of overall vehicular fuel use does junk mail (from inception to landfill) constitute, might you suppose?
It's not just the vehicular fuel that goes into this process, it's the growing the trees, harvesting them, making them into paper, then combining that paper with ink that likely has a similarly complex supply chain on a printing press that consumes a lot of power. Getting flyers that are subsidized by the post office for stuff like lawnmowers and patio furniture even though I live in an apartment is peak absurdity.
I still receive her mail.
Here's the kicker: the mail is addressed to a name she hadn't legally had since the late 1970s. She divorced and remarried - which meant taking her new husband's last name - then lived another 30-ish years, died, I moved in, and it's been ten years of me there.
It's an insanely wasteful practice.
Re: Amazon is adding a fuel surcharge to fees it collects from third-party sellers
#15We could immediately provide relief to fuel prices, while doing the climate a huge favor, by immediately suspending the USPS accepting marketing material through the mail. My mailbox is permanently jammed with paper that useless paper that is both produced and hauled away to a landfill by diesel fuel. No I do not want your credit card offer. No I do not want to switch phone plans. No I do not want an extended warrant…
In FY2022, fuel consumption was 221 million gallons of gasoline equivalent, with gasoline or diesel making up 99%. USPS fleet greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs) made up 70% of overall GHGs for federal fleet vehicles in FY2022. 50-60% of all mail is marketing slop
Your numbers show exactly what I was guessing to be true though. Incredible this has never been enforced.
Re: Amazon is adding a fuel surcharge to fees it collects from third-party sellers
#16Re: Amazon is adding a fuel surcharge to fees it collects from third-party sellers
#17Earlier quoted context omitted.
If the majority of mail stops are junk mail only, I would love to see some napkin math of the effect of all those diesel/gasoline accelerations per mailbox, dropped across the daily fleet of drop offs.
Stopping marketing mail wouldn’t change the number of accelerations per mailbox. USPS would still need to check each stop for outgoing mail. The only difference would be in weight carried.
Of course, where I live the USPS person stops in a general area and does all the outgoing deliveries on foot, but it's conceivable that some days an entire block may receive no incoming mail. Also, we need to take into account things like fuel costs for planes & such throughout the entire supply chain.
Re: Amazon is adding a fuel surcharge to fees it collects from third-party sellers
#18We could immediately provide relief to fuel prices, while doing the climate a huge favor, by immediately suspending the USPS accepting marketing material through the mail. My mailbox is permanently jammed with paper that useless paper that is both produced and hauled away to a landfill by diesel fuel. No I do not want your credit card offer. No I do not want to switch phone plans. No I do not want an extended warrant…
I’ve done it (several times, ‘cuz ten years), you’ll notice an almost immediate reduction in junk mail.
Re: Amazon is adding a fuel surcharge to fees it collects from third-party sellers
#19Earlier quoted context omitted.
If the majority of mail stops are junk mail only, I would love to see some napkin math of the effect of all those diesel/gasoline accelerations per mailbox, dropped across the daily fleet of drop offs.
Stopping marketing mail wouldn’t change the number of accelerations per mailbox. USPS would still need to check each stop for outgoing mail. The only difference would be in weight carried.
No they don’t, that’s what the red flag on the mailbox is for. Everywhere I’ve lived, if you don’t put the flag up and there’s no incoming mail for you, they don’t stop.
Re: Amazon is adding a fuel surcharge to fees it collects from third-party sellers
#20[flagged]
Those who could but didn't vote aren't blameless either.