Thought this was about ruqqus for a second. Rip the bluesky of the right, you were fun.
Good riddance
11–20 of 21 posts
Thought this was about ruqqus for a second. Rip the bluesky of the right, you were fun.
Good riddance
Thought this was about ruqqus for a second. Rip the bluesky of the right, you were fun.
First search returned a Reddit post describing it as “Ruqqus was a "free speech" website. You were totally safe to say whatever you wanted there as long as you weren't a liberal or a Jew” Good riddance
Don't you think knee jerk reactions like yours are part of the reason some people find it so hard to de radicalise?
For Ruckus, I will reinstall Xcode, etc.
Other people have mentioned LispPad that is very good.
LispPad Go is a similar tool focusing on scheme R7RS. It’s been great for writing little scripts. Been using it for a few years now. Racket would be compelling though because of the number of libraries. https://apps.apple.com/us/app/lisppad-go/id1565747728
LispPad Go is a similar tool focusing on scheme R7RS. It’s been great for writing little scripts. Been using it for a few years now. Racket would be compelling though because of the number of libraries. https://apps.apple.com/us/app/lisppad-go/id1565747728
Didn't Apple restrict language interpreters on App Store?
Edit: JIT is under a flag, https://developer.apple.com/documentation/bundleresources/en...
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Didn't Apple restrict language interpreters on App Store?
They restricted JIT, interpreters are fine afaik. See also dart etc. Edit: JIT is under a flag, https://developer.apple.com/documentation/bundleresources/en...
LispPad Go is a similar tool focusing on scheme R7RS. It’s been great for writing little scripts. Been using it for a few years now. Racket would be compelling though because of the number of libraries. https://apps.apple.com/us/app/lisppad-go/id1565747728
I just tried this out, this is amazing! It does actually have a lot of R7RS support (like #!fold-case) however it doesn't seem to work with polar complex numbers (e.g; 2@1.5) or complex numbers with infnan (e.g; 3+inf.0i or +inf.0+3i). more about the implementation: https://www.lisppad.app/applications/language
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I just tried this out, this is amazing! It does actually have a lot of R7RS support (like #!fold-case) however it doesn't seem to work with polar complex numbers (e.g; 2@1.5) or complex numbers with infnan (e.g; 3+inf.0i or +inf.0+3i). more about the implementation: https://www.lisppad.app/applications/language
Author from LispPad here... Polar complex number literals are actually not part of R7RS and (make-polar ...) would need to be used for writing portable code. Complex number literals with infinite parts are supported, but I noticed that LispPad might behave differently as it does apply mathematical equivalences that are being ignored in other Scheme implementations. Let me know if you see a behavior that violates the…
> Polar complex number literals are actually not part of R7RS
I actually thought they were part of the spec. Specifically, I am referring to the last paragraph from section 6.2.5 of R7RS small https://small.r7rs.org/attachment/r7rs.pdf>
This is the excerpt from the pdf:
6.2.5. Syntax of numerical constants
...
There are two notations provided for non-real complex numbers: the rectangular notation a+bi, where a is the real part and b is the imaginary part; and the polar no- tation r@θ, where r is the magnitude and θ is the phase (angle) in radians. These are related by the equation a + bi = r cos θ + (r sin θ)i. All of a, b, r , and θ are real numbers.
I was surprised to be able to install packages from the Racket package server. The search is case sensitive (be sure to use all lowercase instead of the default first capital letter) and the install can take a while, but it works!
edit: reported https://github.com/Bogdanp/Ruckus/issues/17