Live data from Hacker News

I quit. The clankers won

dbushell.com

11–20 of 515 posts

Re: I quit. The clankers won

#13
One problem writing does have: we grew up in a massive changing and progressing software writing area. A golden area.

Now i still show clean code videos from bob and other old things to new hires and young collegues.

Java got more features, given but the golden area of discovery is over.

The new big thing is ai and i'm curious to see how it will feel to write real agents for my company specific use cases.

But i'm also seeing people so bad in their daily jobs, that I wish to get their salary as tokens to use. It will change and it changes our field.

Btw. "Is there anything, in the entire recorded history of human creation, that could have possibly mattered less than the flatulence Sora produced? NFTs had more value." i disagree, video generation has a massive impact on the industry for a lot of people. Don't down play this. NFTs btw. never had any impact besides moving money from a to b

Re: I quit. The clankers won

#15
post #7

"No AI" right above a robot voice playback button. Mixed messages fr Hot take, folks packing it in because of AI probably were not difference makers before AI, and wouldn't be difference makers after it either. I agree with the author, keep writing. It helps hone your ability to communicate effectively which we all need for some time to come (at least until we become batteries).

What does a synthesized audio playback button have to do with AI as commonly and hotly discussed?

Re: I quit. The clankers won

#16
post #7

"No AI" right above a robot voice playback button. Mixed messages fr Hot take, folks packing it in because of AI probably were not difference makers before AI, and wouldn't be difference makers after it either. I agree with the author, keep writing. It helps hone your ability to communicate effectively which we all need for some time to come (at least until we become batteries).

> folks packing it in because of AI probably were not difference makers before AI

Anecdotal but I’ve been seeing a lot of the opposite. Some of those leaning in strongly are being propped up by the tools. Holding onto them like a lifeboat when they would have fallen off earlier.

Re: I quit. The clankers won

#17
"Generative AI is art. It’s irredeemably shit art; end of conversation."

I think most people cannot destinguish between "genuine" creativity and an artificial almalgamation of training data and human provided context. For one, I do not know what already exsists. Some work created by AI may be an obvious rip off of the style of a particular artist, but I wouldnt know. To me it might look awesome and fresh.

I think many of the more human centric thinkers will be disappointed at how many people just wont care.

Re: I quit. The clankers won

#18
> The AI industry is 99% hype; a billion dollar industrial complex to put a price tag on creation. At this point if you believe AI is ‘just a tool’ you’re wilfully ignoring the harm.

> (Regardless, why do I keep being told it’s an ‘extreme’ stance if I decide not to buy something?)

> The 1% utility AI has is overshadowed by the overwhelming mediocracy it regurgitates.

This sort of reasoning is why you might have been called extreme.

It's less extreme to say "many people see and/or get lots of benefit, but it's wrong to use the tool due to the harms it has".

There's nothing wrong with extreme, but since you asked.

Re: I quit. The clankers won

#19

Picking out my favorite idea out of many: we do need ways to stay mentally sharp in the age of AI. Writing and publishing is a good one. I also recommend stimulating human conversations and long-form reading. More and more the bar is being lowered. Don’t fall to brain rot. Don’t quite quit. Stay active and engaged, and you’ll begin to stand out among your peers.

I'm pretty sure all this AI is built on top of Silicon valley's technobabble of "permanent underclass" which seems to have zero introspection as to why we're just going to accept the feudal overlords of technology.

But besides that, it's interesting so many people are willing to tailor their entire workflow and product to indeterminate machines and business culture.

I recommend everyone stop using these infernal cloud devices and start with a nice local model that doesn't instantly give you everything, but is quite capabable of removing a select amount of drudgery that is rather relaxing. And as soon as you get too lazy to do enough specifying or real coding, it fucks up your dev environment and you slap yuorself a hundred times wondering why you ever trusted someone else to properly build your artifaces.

There's definitely some philosophy being edged into our spaces that need to be combatted.

Post reply on HN