11–20 of 23 posts
Additionally, this was practically predicted and expected by so many people, the second the off-hours increase was announced.
Shoddy company
Funny how before the announcement, people who were experiencing this were being gaslighted on different platforms, to think they have a "skill" issue using Claude Code Additionally, this was practically predicted and expected by so many people, the second the off-hours increase was announced. Shoddy company
The longer this goes on the more it becomes clear Google is going to be the last one standing.
Funny how before the announcement, people who were experiencing this were being gaslighted on different platforms, to think they have a "skill" issue using Claude Code Additionally, this was practically predicted and expected by so many people, the second the off-hours increase was announced. Shoddy company
Its a sign that they cannot simply raise the price of existing paying customer's to avoid putting on limits - and/or - convert more free users into paying customers. The longer this goes on the more it becomes clear Google is going to be the last one standing.
I love the interface of Claude Code but with these limits I’d be willing to use Codex. Anyone know if it’s possible to use Claude Code with other provider subscriptions (not API usage costs)?
First, this has been going on for a week now and Anthropic support was gaslighting people, saying nothing has changed. Well, obviously it has, they said it now. Additionally, Anthropic saying weekly limits are unaffected is also a lie. I exhausted 37% of my weekly on the first day when this started on Monday. This has never happened before. So this is two lies in a row.
But now the bigger issue - what does Anthropic expect me to do when I'm out of quota on day 1 of the week? Emphasis on me having a lot of free time without access to claude.
There can only be 3 options:
1. I'll buy more $200 subscriptions from a provider that I've caught lying and gaslighting me. 2. I'll only work 1 day in a week and accomplish nothing. 3. I'll explore other models / providers to see if I can fill the gap.
The right choice is very clear. But can't Anthropic see that their only moat is that ecosystem was built around claude code because they were first to do this subscription stuff and their harness didn't get in the way too much?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Its a sign that they cannot simply raise the price of existing paying customer's to avoid putting on limits - and/or - convert more free users into paying customers. The longer this goes on the more it becomes clear Google is going to be the last one standing.
Why because 7% of people complain the loudest? I would imagine that most power users have big followings on X, Reddit, HN, etc.. but that hardly reflects the reality of what most people are experiencing.
Users who aren't using their quota will gradually disappear when that 7% starts being loud in the other direction.
Anthropic is probably the only AI company that is trying to stop absolutely hemorrhaging money and reach profitability and financial sustainability. They aren't far off - they burn a tiny fraction of the cash of OAI and achieve similar ARR despite this - but as they tighten the belt it's inevitable that companies like OAI come in and offer more subsidized (unsustainable) inference to get people to switch. They will i…
The winner will be the last man standing. The company which is able to continue subsidizing tokens after all others have been forced to throttle and raise prices. Soak up the market share, wait for your rivals’ investors to get cold feet, then raise prices the morning after the last one folds. (It’s Google it’s always been Google)
This will just get worse, particularly when you consider just how shitty the US government is becoming at properly managing the basic necessities for stability. IF you arn't planning a local LLm strategy, you're surely tying your lifeline to anchors.