While the author mentioned multiple passes through the block didn't help in this instance, I can't help but wonder if it would work if it were built in during training.
LLM Neuroanatomy II: Modern LLM Hacking and Hints of a Universal Language?
11–20 of 44 posts
Re: LLM Neuroanatomy II: Modern LLM Hacking and Hints of a Universal Language?
#12he learnt icelandic in week and had a fluent conversation on their national TV to prove it. (this is nuts, that language is extremely difficult to pickup with nasal sounds etc.)
ofcourse i guess its not even close to average to have such a abilities as a human, but i wonder if at some point LLMs and AI algorithms and models might shed light on such kind of abstractions (like some mentioned in comments also about image recognition algos) that might help humans actually learn these things themselves, train on them and perhaps even get taught such a thing as a skill.
Re: LLM Neuroanatomy II: Modern LLM Hacking and Hints of a Universal Language?
#13Apologies if I missed this in the article (or in the first article in the series) - what happens if you add two copies of the layer set? Does performance improve over adding one copy of the layer set?
It turns out this does not help (somewhat surprisingly).
Re: LLM Neuroanatomy II: Modern LLM Hacking and Hints of a Universal Language?
#14How's the reproducibility of the results? Like avg score of 10 runs vs original.
The probes I used seem to help identify good configurations, but are quite noisey. A small probe set was initially used to make the scan tractable, and then the higher ranked models were retested on a set ~10x larger.
Re: LLM Neuroanatomy II: Modern LLM Hacking and Hints of a Universal Language?
#15Apologies if I missed this in the article (or in the first article in the series) - what happens if you add two copies of the layer set? Does performance improve over adding one copy of the layer set?
Author here: That was done in this blog post, in the beam search. I started with the best re-layer configs, and iteratively added more blocks, including the same multiple times, during a long beam search. It turns out this does not help (somewhat surprisingly).
Re: LLM Neuroanatomy II: Modern LLM Hacking and Hints of a Universal Language?
#16Re: LLM Neuroanatomy II: Modern LLM Hacking and Hints of a Universal Language?
#17The RYS (repeat yourself) hypothesis that duplicating (the right) layers is enough to improve performance (sorry for not reading closely enough, it's really just stacking the relevant layers?).
The ERD (encoding, reasoning, decoding) layer structure is a relatively robust observation? That the middle layers of the NN will reason in universal space, and this is kinda evidenced by cosine similarities of the hidden states at each layer given similar or dissimilar inputs. And that similar inputs converges by layer 5 and you can kinda watch that happen in the cosine similarities?
This post is incredible and I'm afraid it'll drop off the front page before people engage deeply with it. (The methodology was interesting, maybe there's other big ideas I'm missing.)
Re: LLM Neuroanatomy II: Modern LLM Hacking and Hints of a Universal Language?
#18This was a little dense for me to grok. Are these well known results or is there an abstract-like summary? The RYS (repeat yourself) hypothesis that duplicating (the right) layers is enough to improve performance (sorry for not reading closely enough, it's really just stacking the relevant layers?). The ERD (encoding, reasoning, decoding) layer structure is a relatively robust observation? That the middle layers of t…
Though beware that the increased score on math and EQ could lead to other areas scoring less well; would love to see how these models score on all open benchmarks.
Re: LLM Neuroanatomy II: Modern LLM Hacking and Hints of a Universal Language?
#19Re: LLM Neuroanatomy II: Modern LLM Hacking and Hints of a Universal Language?
#20We've discovered the language. It changes the economics of computing. As in, this entire cloud buildout is unnecessary because it becomes like using a calculator. Reach out to chat.
Would you be willing to elaborate? I would be curious to hear more.