Google Search is now using AI to replace headlines
11–17 of 17 posts
Re: Google Search is now using AI to replace headlines
#12Earlier quoted context omitted.
I hate clickbait headlines but I disagree. Let a site succeed or fail based on their choices. If they want to use clickbait headlines they won’t get my clicks. Rewriting headlines feels like a fundamental break in the contract of a search engine.
I mean HN modifies headlines all the time. Sometimes hours after the fact. News sites themselves A/B test headlines constantly. I don't really think there is any "contract" to speak of.
Re: Google Search is now using AI to replace headlines
#13Re: Google Search is now using AI to replace headlines
#14Earlier quoted context omitted.
I hate clickbait headlines but I disagree. Let a site succeed or fail based on their choices. If they want to use clickbait headlines they won’t get my clicks. Rewriting headlines feels like a fundamental break in the contract of a search engine.
I mean HN modifies headlines all the time. Sometimes hours after the fact. News sites themselves A/B test headlines constantly. I don't really think there is any "contract" to speak of.
Re: Google Search is now using AI to replace headlines
#15“I figured that I could always fall back to those blue links to get a relatively unadulterated experience. Now, I have to wonder.” When the last neutral layer goes, what's left is the people you chose to follow. I've been sitting with that thought while building https://murmel.social
Re: Google Search is now using AI to replace headlines
#16Re: Google Search is now using AI to replace headlines
#17“I figured that I could always fall back to those blue links to get a relatively unadulterated experience. Now, I have to wonder.” When the last neutral layer goes, what's left is the people you chose to follow. I've been sitting with that thought while building https://murmel.social
Cool. Anything different from https://sill.social ?