Nvidia's Huang pitches AI tokens on top of salary
11–20 of 38 posts
Re: Nvidia's Huang pitches AI tokens on top of salary
#12shouldnt the tokens belong to the employer?
i understand the concept of an engineering having tools they own but if they're gonna shove tokens-as-utility down our throats, no boss, i'm not hooking you into my well water.
Re: Nvidia's Huang pitches AI tokens on top of salary
#13Re: Nvidia's Huang pitches AI tokens on top of salary
#14Huang is absolutely losing the plot, salary is compensation for work done, for time spent away from other things in life, and to sustain your life outside of work. Tokens as "compensation" falls into the not-even-wrong bucket, tokens are business expenses as input for work. Edit: it's actually CNBC using deceptive language in the article, not Huang proposing paying people with tokens as brought up by OJFord [0]. [0]…
Re: Nvidia's Huang pitches AI tokens on top of salary
#15Huang is absolutely losing the plot, salary is compensation for work done, for time spent away from other things in life, and to sustain your life outside of work. Tokens as "compensation" falls into the not-even-wrong bucket, tokens are business expenses as input for work. Edit: it's actually CNBC using deceptive language in the article, not Huang proposing paying people with tokens as brought up by OJFord [0]. [0]…
If a company can provide a service or product to employees cheaper than the market can, then it makes sense to provide it as a perk.
Re: Nvidia's Huang pitches AI tokens on top of salary
#16EDIT: If the tokens are not intended as a form of perk/benefit as others have interpreted, I guess my point does not count.
Re: Nvidia's Huang pitches AI tokens on top of salary
#17Huang is absolutely losing the plot, salary is compensation for work done, for time spent away from other things in life, and to sustain your life outside of work. Tokens as "compensation" falls into the not-even-wrong bucket, tokens are business expenses as input for work. Edit: it's actually CNBC using deceptive language in the article, not Huang proposing paying people with tokens as brought up by OJFord [0]. [0]…
Many of Nvidia's employees probably use token outside of work. Just like they just cars, heath insurance, and other benefits that many companies provide on top of salary. If a company can provide a service or product to employees cheaper than the market can, then it makes sense to provide it as a perk.
Re: Nvidia's Huang pitches AI tokens on top of salary
#18He's saying it more like a learning & development or conference budget, that it's a tool people need and are going to ask about or want to hear they have a good level of access to when they're looking for a job.
(I've been looking and already asking about it, I think we're already there. Not because I need it personally, but partly just to understand what the AI use is like within the companies I've been talking to.)
Re: Nvidia's Huang pitches AI tokens on top of salary
#19Reminds me of the pre-prohibition era where distilleries often paid their workers by giving them liquor (payment in kind) to manage liquidity issues. This looks like a clever way to try to compete for talent without continuing to ratchet up pay, allowing Nvidia to continue to expand their debt without needing additional cash.
Re: Nvidia's Huang pitches AI tokens on top of salary
#20It's different in every company, but a lot of them really don't like side projects. I imagine if you build anything worthwhile some Nvidia lawyers might try to claim ownership.