In a social media post on Wednesday, the hacking group that claimed responsibility said the Stryker hack was retaliation for a missile strike on an elementary school in Iran... Being sickened and angered by the killing of so many schoolgirls, who happen to be Iranian, makes you "Pro-Iran"? Strange world.
They're angry about civilians dying, so they want different civilians to die from lack of medical devices?
Pro-Iran hackers claim cyberattack on major US medical device maker
11–16 of 16 posts
Re: Pro-Iran hackers claim cyberattack on major US medical device maker
#12In a social media post on Wednesday, the hacking group that claimed responsibility said the Stryker hack was retaliation for a missile strike on an elementary school in Iran... Being sickened and angered by the killing of so many schoolgirls, who happen to be Iranian, makes you "Pro-Iran"? Strange world.
They're angry about civilians dying, so they want different civilians to die from lack of medical devices?
People and nations should expect that an attack will be met with an attack.
If a bully is hitting someone, one of the most effective ways of stopping it completely is hitting back.
Re: Pro-Iran hackers claim cyberattack on major US medical device maker
#13Iran is fighting against ring of Epstein friends.
Maybe they should start dealing with this in their own country before fighting against it in other places.
Re: Pro-Iran hackers claim cyberattack on major US medical device maker
#14Iran is fighting against ring of Epstein friends.
Re: Pro-Iran hackers claim cyberattack on major US medical device maker
#15Earlier quoted context omitted.
Nuance is dead, it is all collectively distilled to a binary choice these days.
It's becoming tiresome to see nuance vanishing even here on HN. "My team is right, your team is wrong. You must chose my team otherwise it means you're with them and so you're wrong and my enemy" No, you can both be wrong and right.