The custom Lipo battery with thermal effects and weight considered is really beautiful to see. I've been curious about custom Lipo battery shapes for rings because my fingers get cold when I wear rings. Would a battery heating up just a bit help make that comfortable for me?
CT Scans of Health Wearables
11–20 of 54 posts
Re: CT Scans of Health Wearables
#12The custom Lipo battery with thermal effects and weight considered is really beautiful to see. I've been curious about custom Lipo battery shapes for rings because my fingers get cold when I wear rings. Would a battery heating up just a bit help make that comfortable for me?
Would a battery heating up just a bit help make that comfortable for me?
In something ring-sized? Maybe for about five minutes, and then the battery dies. (I assume you mean using resistive elements to create heat; heating the actual battery seems like a bad idea.)
Re: CT Scans of Health Wearables
#13Is it just me or did the tonality in this one change towards an infomercial?
Could be, the company behind the website would like to sell you an industrial CT scanner.
Re: CT Scans of Health Wearables
#14I dont want CT scans of wearables. I want wearables that can do CT scans.
That is not even close to feasible with today's level of technology, and will not be for quite some time.
Re: CT Scans of Health Wearables
#15I dont want CT scans of wearables. I want wearables that can do CT scans.
well, maybe wearables that provide some sort of internal visual scans. But with CT scans delivering 70 times the radiation of a typical x-ray, I think I'd prefer not wearing a portable chernobyl. Maybe a wearable ultrasound instead? edit: after a little informal side-searching after posting this, I've learned that people working at Chernobyl, not in the reactor directly, but elsewhere in the sprawling site received a…
> Maybe a wearable ultrasound instead?
If one is concerned about the potentially damaging effects of radiation, and the relative safety of ultrasound technology springs to mind, then one may be also interested in reading more about the apparently forbidden topic of ultrasound safety studies, if such a person can get past the cognitive dissonance from having been told the consensus opinion on how safe ultrasound is, e.g.:
https://www.amazon.com/Studies-Conducted-Indicate-Prenatal-U...
https://www.westonaprice.org/book-reviews/50-human-studies-j...
http://whale.to/c/50_human_studies.html
https://harvoa.substack.com/p/dbr
The jury may still be out?
Re: CT Scans of Health Wearables
#16Earlier quoted context omitted.
well, maybe wearables that provide some sort of internal visual scans. But with CT scans delivering 70 times the radiation of a typical x-ray, I think I'd prefer not wearing a portable chernobyl. Maybe a wearable ultrasound instead? edit: after a little informal side-searching after posting this, I've learned that people working at Chernobyl, not in the reactor directly, but elsewhere in the sprawling site received a…
> Maybe a wearable ultrasound instead? If one is concerned about the potentially damaging effects of radiation, and the relative safety of ultrasound technology springs to mind, then one may be also interested in reading more about the apparently forbidden topic of ultrasound safety studies, if such a person can get past the cognitive dissonance from having been told the consensus opinion on how safe ultrasound is, e…
All of those links are for the same book from 2015 (the fourth isn't direct to the relevant article but it's easy to find on the page). Has there been any new information since then?
Re: CT Scans of Health Wearables
#17Earlier quoted context omitted.
well, maybe wearables that provide some sort of internal visual scans. But with CT scans delivering 70 times the radiation of a typical x-ray, I think I'd prefer not wearing a portable chernobyl. Maybe a wearable ultrasound instead? edit: after a little informal side-searching after posting this, I've learned that people working at Chernobyl, not in the reactor directly, but elsewhere in the sprawling site received a…
> Maybe a wearable ultrasound instead? If one is concerned about the potentially damaging effects of radiation, and the relative safety of ultrasound technology springs to mind, then one may be also interested in reading more about the apparently forbidden topic of ultrasound safety studies, if such a person can get past the cognitive dissonance from having been told the consensus opinion on how safe ultrasound is, e…
I personally prefer to approach the topic of "safety" by considering the trade-offs. The knowledge gained through ultrasound significantly outweighs potential risks associated with it.
People still continue to play the lotto thinking they will win, and they reject statistically low risks in lieu of a greater risk created by avoidance. See: any vaccination topic.
When shifting into the topic of a wearable though, the extreme amount of time alone amplifies the risks into outright dangerous levels. I did not seriously believe ultrasound to be safe to that level.
Re: CT Scans of Health Wearables
#18The custom Lipo battery with thermal effects and weight considered is really beautiful to see. I've been curious about custom Lipo battery shapes for rings because my fingers get cold when I wear rings. Would a battery heating up just a bit help make that comfortable for me?
> my fingers get cold when I wear rings
Unless the ring is shaped as a heatsink/radiator, I imagine it would eventually get into equilibrium, and you wouldn't feel the heat-flux.
Is it possible that the "coldness" comes from its indirect affect on blood-circulation?
Re: CT Scans of Health Wearables
#19Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Maybe a wearable ultrasound instead? If one is concerned about the potentially damaging effects of radiation, and the relative safety of ultrasound technology springs to mind, then one may be also interested in reading more about the apparently forbidden topic of ultrasound safety studies, if such a person can get past the cognitive dissonance from having been told the consensus opinion on how safe ultrasound is, e…
All of those links are for the same book from 2015 (the fourth isn't direct to the relevant article but it's easy to find on the page). Has there been any new information since then?
The 50 studies in the cited 2015 book ought to span a range of time, and their keywords could be used to search literature for more recent material.
> Has there been any new information since then?
Since you asked, there apparently was a 2017 followup book by the same author. These links are for that book:
https://harvoa.org/chs/pr/dusbk2.htm
https://www.amazon.com/Ultrasound-Causation-Microcephaly-Vir...
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/36466945-ultrasound-caus...
Re: CT Scans of Health Wearables
#20Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Maybe a wearable ultrasound instead? If one is concerned about the potentially damaging effects of radiation, and the relative safety of ultrasound technology springs to mind, then one may be also interested in reading more about the apparently forbidden topic of ultrasound safety studies, if such a person can get past the cognitive dissonance from having been told the consensus opinion on how safe ultrasound is, e…
I personally prefer to approach the topic of "safety" by considering the trade-offs. The knowledge gained through ultrasound significantly outweighs potential risks associated with it. People still continue to play the lotto thinking they will win, and they reject statistically low risks in lieu of a greater risk created by avoidance. See: any vaccination topic. When shifting into the topic of a wearable though, the…
> a wearable though, the extreme amount of time alone amplifies the risks
The time, and also the proximity.
As I understand it, the potential dangers of a lot of these kinds of things dissipate quite rapidly with distance.
But with wearables, the emitters are quite literally strapped against the body (practically zero distance).