Does anyone know which law firm is representing anthropic?
Pentagon formally labels Anthropic supply-chain risk
11–20 of 319 posts
Re: Pentagon formally labels Anthropic supply-chain risk
#12The consequence is that any company that does business with the U.S. military, and potentially any company that does business with the government in general, must stop using Anthropic's products for that work. Anthropic has vowed to fight this designation in court. Without weighing in on the constitutionality or legality of the move, I think it's obvious that this kind of retaliation power is unmatched by any private…
Apparently that's not 100% true. The DoD contractor itself can still use Anthropic's technology, just not on U.S. military contract projects.
Re: Pentagon formally labels Anthropic supply-chain risk
#13A reminder to Anthropic, european residence visas start at $250K
Re: Pentagon formally labels Anthropic supply-chain risk
#14Isn’t it actually quite fair that if you are not compliant with whatever the government wants you to do you will be supplying chain risk?
For example from history we know that Schindler from Schindler's List was indeed a supply chain risk. He harbored persecuted people, he took and sabotaged government contracts. He did the moral but anti-government and illegal things. He was corrupt traitor from governments perspective.
The current US government already is labeled as fascist by many, the guy who designated Anthropic supply chain risk is allegedly a war criminal.
I don’t see why anyone not into these things would not be a supply chain risk.
I know that its very unpopular or divisive to say this but Anthropic can be a hero only after all this is over. At this time people in charge do double tap on survivors and take pride for not having conscience, they give speeches about these things.
Re: Pentagon formally labels Anthropic supply-chain risk
#15I said it before and I say it again: If openly bribing a crony gov to cancel your competitor is now the de-facto standard of making business in the US, I don't see how any rational investor could still see US companies as a secure investment. When the rule of law degrades into pay-to-play politics, the inevitable result is a mass exodus of both capital and top-tier talent.
And to add to this quoting another commentator on the issue: First the Meritocracy goes, then the Freedom goes.
Re: Pentagon formally labels Anthropic supply-chain risk
#16Exported all my chats and deleted my ChatGPT account yesterday. The current administration not liking you is the strongest signal I could possibly have to go all in on a particular company.
Re: Pentagon formally labels Anthropic supply-chain risk
#17Next up, after some sort of bribe, the administration opens up Qwen models to be used by the Pentagon.
Re: Pentagon formally labels Anthropic supply-chain risk
#18I said it before and I say it again: If openly bribing a crony gov to cancel your competitor is now the de-facto standard of making business in the US, I don't see how any rational investor could still see US companies as a secure investment. When the rule of law degrades into pay-to-play politics, the inevitable result is a mass exodus of both capital and top-tier talent. And to add to this quoting another commentat…
[deleted]
Re: Pentagon formally labels Anthropic supply-chain risk
#19I would love to understand in more detail what kind of use cases we’re talking about.
Is this about locating the right target for a sortie for example?
Re: Pentagon formally labels Anthropic supply-chain risk
#20Once again our leadership is "playing government" like a bunch of 12-year-olds, lashing out impulsively without thinking of the consequences. And no doubt once again it'll take a year for this to wind its way through the legal system and be reversed long after the damage is done, as is finally happening with the tariff fiasco.