Live data from Hacker News

US tech firms pledge at White House to bear costs of energy for datacenters

theguardian.com

11–20 of 265 posts

Re: US tech firms pledge at White House to bear costs of energy for datacenters

#11

[flagged]

Using Claude to provide a legal definition of "pledge" is unconvincing at best. > What are the legal protections of a “pledge”? To answer that question is to first agree upon the legal definition of "pledge": pledge v. to deposit personal property as security for a personal loan of money. If the loan is not repaid when due, the personal property pledged shall be forfeit to the lender. The property is known as collate…

[deleted]

Re: US tech firms pledge at White House to bear costs of energy for datacenters

#15

[flagged]

Using Claude to provide a legal definition of "pledge" is unconvincing at best. > What are the legal protections of a “pledge”? To answer that question is to first agree upon the legal definition of "pledge": pledge v. to deposit personal property as security for a personal loan of money. If the loan is not repaid when due, the personal property pledged shall be forfeit to the lender. The property is known as collate…

Your answer is less useful and thought out than the Claude response. Claude actually answers the question in the context in which it's being asked.

Re: US tech firms pledge at White House to bear costs of energy for datacenters

#17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Using Claude to provide a legal definition of "pledge" is unconvincing at best. > What are the legal protections of a “pledge”? To answer that question is to first agree upon the legal definition of "pledge": pledge v. to deposit personal property as security for a personal loan of money. If the loan is not repaid when due, the personal property pledged shall be forfeit to the lender. The property is known as collate…

Wait, we know it’s not your definition, because it’s inapplicable.

> Wait, we know it’s not your definition ...

Of course it is not "my definition", as I cited the source of it.

> ... because it’s inapplicable.

Take that up with law.com.

Re: US tech firms pledge at White House to bear costs of energy for datacenters

#18

[flagged]

I'd be cautious about using Claude, given that they're designated as a supply chain risk by the US Government. Why not use the approved and officially certified ChatGPT instead?

I'm assuming there's a missing /s tag there.

Re: US tech firms pledge at White House to bear costs of energy for datacenters

#20
Do they pledge the costs of noise pollution and damage to water sources? Let’s be honest - these pledges are theater that reflects an agreement between tech oligarchs and the Trump administration. The pay the bribes via donations or whatever, and get back this deceptive theater show.
Post reply on HN