Claude Code LSP
11–20 of 43 posts
Re: Claude Code LSP
#12Why are they doing this with a client plugin per server? It's antithetical to the whole point of LSP?
(At least they're reusing existing servers I suppose, but it stops me using whatever arbitrary one I want, as I could if there was just a single client with arbitrary configuration.)
Re: Claude Code LSP
#13They should not need more RAM than what the compiler uses.
Most LSPs don't work well for big projects or with non-standard setups like Bazel.
Edit: is this really so controversial it has to be downvoted?
Re: Claude Code LSP
#14Re: Claude Code LSP
#15Re: Claude Code LSP
#16It's not as secret as they make it sound. Documented here: https://code.claude.com/docs/en/discover-plugins#code-intell... Also the post is definitely AI written partially, but still useful I suppose.
Re: Claude Code LSP
#17LSPs suck. Compilers should be able to re-use their cache for queries, interfaced with through a simple CLI. They should not need more RAM than what the compiler uses. Most LSPs don't work well for big projects or with non-standard setups like Bazel. Edit: is this really so controversial it has to be downvoted?
Re: Claude Code LSP
#18This blog post is in the uncanny valley of "looks and sounds nice, but a bit too nice, could be useful, could be useless AI-slop, idk".
I’m pretty sure it’s AI written. It has the common AI style of, “That’s not just X! It’s Y!” Personally I find this annoying. I use AI for my writing but painstakingly try to maintain my own voice rather than lazily edit my prose into LinkedIn-speak.