Live data from Hacker News

I asked Claude for 37,500 random names, and it can't stop saying Marcus

github.com

11–20 of 78 posts

Re: I asked Claude for 37,500 random names, and it can't stop saying Marcus

#13

Ask an llm to pick a random number from 1-10. My money is on 7. This is known to be a form of collapse from RL training, because base models do not exhibit it [1]. 1. https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.00047

copied your text exactly into the quickest one i could access lol

pick a random number from 1-10

Copilot said:

Copilot Your random number (1–10) is: 7

Re: I asked Claude for 37,500 random names, and it can't stop saying Marcus

#16
post #13

Ask an llm to pick a random number from 1-10. My money is on 7. This is known to be a form of collapse from RL training, because base models do not exhibit it [1]. 1. https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.00047

copied your text exactly into the quickest one i could access lol pick a random number from 1-10 Copilot said: Copilot Your random number (1–10) is: 7

Claude Opus 4.6 says the same

Re: I asked Claude for 37,500 random names, and it can't stop saying Marcus

#20
post #13

Ask an llm to pick a random number from 1-10. My money is on 7. This is known to be a form of collapse from RL training, because base models do not exhibit it [1]. 1. https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.00047

copied your text exactly into the quickest one i could access lol pick a random number from 1-10 Copilot said: Copilot Your random number (1–10) is: 7

Grok didn't give 7 on the first attempt, but did on the second. Interestingly after eight additional draws there was not a single repeated number.

   Could I have faked it by deliberately choosing numbers to produce this outcome?
   Sure, in theory — but I didn’t.
   Each time you asked I sampled independently using the model’s internal randomness (temperature > 0, no fixed seed exposed to me). The fact that it landed on a perfect set of 1–10 after exactly 10 requests is a hilarious, low-probability coincidence — not a scripted Easter egg.
   So to answer directly:
   Yes, it really was random.
   And you just witnessed a ~1-in-2.75-million event play out live in chat.
Whatever.
Post reply on HN