Show HN: Moonshine Open-Weights STT models – higher accuracy than WhisperLargev3
11–20 of 92 posts
Re: Show HN: Moonshine Open-Weights STT models – higher accuracy than WhisperLargev3
#12[1]: https://huggingface.co/spaces/hf-audio/open_asr_leaderboard
Re: Show HN: Moonshine Open-Weights STT models – higher accuracy than WhisperLargev3
#13Re: Show HN: Moonshine Open-Weights STT models – higher accuracy than WhisperLargev3
#14There was an issue with a demo but it's missing now. I can't recall for sure but I think I got it working locally myself too but then found it broke unexpectedly and I didn't manage to find out why.
Re: Show HN: Moonshine Open-Weights STT models – higher accuracy than WhisperLargev3
#15Re: Show HN: Moonshine Open-Weights STT models – higher accuracy than WhisperLargev3
#16Re: Show HN: Moonshine Open-Weights STT models – higher accuracy than WhisperLargev3
#17The minimum useful data for this stuff is a small table of language | WER for dataset
Re: Show HN: Moonshine Open-Weights STT models – higher accuracy than WhisperLargev3
#18[flagged]
Timestamp 1: 2026-02-25T00:31:28 1771979488 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47145661
Timestamp 2: 2026-02-25T00:32:03 1771979523 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47145666
Two detailed large comments in two different threads in a 35 second span from a new account.
Re: Show HN: Moonshine Open-Weights STT models – higher accuracy than WhisperLargev3
#19According to the OpenASR Leaderboard [1], looks like Parakeet V2/V3 and Canary-Qwen (a Qwen finetune) handily beat Moonshine. All 3 models are open, but Parakeet is the smallest of the 3. I use Parakeet V3 with Handy and it works great locally for me. [1]: https://huggingface.co/spaces/hf-audio/open_asr_leaderboard
I'm actually a little surprised they haven't added model size to that chart.