Live data from Hacker News

Emulated Windows 3.11 in the Browser

pieter.com

11–20 of 84 posts

Re: Emulated Windows 3.11 in the Browser

#11
post #5

"For the best experience, use Chrome." That's not Windows 3.11. That kind of thing is circa 2000, and a state none of us should want the Web to return to.

If this were a commercial project then I could understand the complaint.. but this is just a small, for-fun project and they have little motivation to put the extra effort into support for all browsers.

Bellard (yes, him) already had a working VM of Windows 2000 in the browser around a decade ago, with no specific "support for all browsers" (whatever that means):

https://bellard.org/jslinux/vm.html?url=win2k.cfg&mem=192&gr...

Re: Emulated Windows 3.11 in the Browser

#14
post #6

Look at how fast Excel loads. Compare to modern high-end PC with it's latest version.

Office really chugged on the PCs of the time though. We can debate whether modern Excel actually delivers enough more value than historical Excel to justify being as more resource-hungry, thus slower to load, as it is. But historical Excel appears fast on modern hardware, even in emulation, because the CPU, RAM, and permanent storage have had 30 years to evolve since it was released. Contemporary 386s and 486s would not have been that snappy.

Re: Emulated Windows 3.11 in the Browser

#17

Can we have icons like these again please. I started from Windows 98 and always loved the icons. They actually represented the application and purpose. These days they are more focused on looking modern. Lots of times they are not even distinguishable between each other.

C:\Windows\System32\moricons.dll is still available, you can set them on shortcuts in Properties with the "Change icon" button.

Re: Emulated Windows 3.11 in the Browser

#20
Ah. Every time I look at the UI, I realize just how much the modern UI/UX degraded.

We had clear colorful icons, text labels, scrollbars, clearly distinguishable checkboxes. And now we have UI that actively promotes "rebelliousness" and "being in the know".

Post reply on HN