Not to be that curmudgeon (who am I kidding), but it's made reviewing code very much less enjoyable, and I review more changes than I write. Engineers merrily sending fixes they barely understand (or, worse, don't think they need to understand) for the rest of us to handle, and somehow lines-of-code has become a positive metric again. How convenient!
AI made coding more enjoyable
11–20 of 103 posts
Re: AI made coding more enjoyable
#12Yeah, yeah, lighthouseapp.io offers AI summaries and more AI is planned:
https://lighthouseapp.io/blog/introducing-lighthouse
It looks like a vibe coded website.
Re: AI made coding more enjoyable
#13I feel the same way. > That includes code outside of the happy path, like error handling and input validation. But also other typing exercises like processing an entity with 10 different types, where each type must be handled separately. Or propagating one property through the system on 5 different types in multiple layers. With AI, I feel I'm less caught up in the minutia of programming and have more cognitive space…
> explore new approaches and connect ideas faster
This is the hidden super power of LLM - prototyping without attachment to the outcome.
Ten years ago, if you wanted to explore a major architectural decision, you would be bogged down for weeks in meetings convincing others, then a few more weeks making it happen. Then if it didn't work out, it feels like failure and everyone gets frustrated.
Now it's assumed you can make it work fast - so do it four different ways and test it empirically. LLMs bring us closer to doing actual science, so we can do away with all the voodoo agile rituals and high emotional attachment that used to dominate the decision process.
Re: AI made coding more enjoyable
#14>Outside the happy path
Uh, no. The happy path is the easy part with little to no thinking required. Edge cases and error handling is where we have to think hardest and learn the most.
Re: AI made coding more enjoyable
#15[deleted]
Re: AI made coding more enjoyable
#16I used to share this sentiment but the more I used AI for programming, the less I enjoyed it. Even writing "boring" code (like tests or summaries) by hand increased my understanding of what I wrote and how it integrates into the rest of the codebase, which I think is fun. Letting a robot write code for me, however tedious it would be to write manually, made me feel like I was working in someone else's codebase. It re…
I generally agree with you. As a recent father with a toddler, and two parents with a full time job, I’ve found that the only way I can make time for those personal side projects is to use AI to do most of the bootstrapping, and then do the final tweaks on my own. Most of this is around home automation, managing my Linux ISO server, among other things. But it certainly would be more fun and rewarding if I did it all myself.
Re: AI made coding more enjoyable
#17Coding with AI is for those kids who were supposed to “stop playing games and clean their room right this minute”, but instead they shove all the crap in their closet and go back to playing games.
Re: AI made coding more enjoyable
#18At what point do LLMs enable bad engineering practices, if instead of working to abstract or encapsulate toilsome programming tasks we point an expensive slot machine at them and generate a bunch of verbose code and carry on? I'm not sure where the tradeoff leads if there's no longer a pain signal for things that need to be re-thought or re-architected. And when anyone does create a new framework or abstraction, it doesn't have enough prior art for an LLM to adeptly generate, and fails to gain traction.
Re: AI made coding more enjoyable
#19When I tried using a coding agent it felt like the AI was stealing my dopamine hits.
Re: AI made coding more enjoyable
#20It made coding way different for me. I'm able to get a proof-of-concept for an idea up pretty quick, and then I have to go back and decide if I like the style it produced.
I feel more like a software producer or director than an engineer though.