[flagged]
These are not humans, are they?
4chan for Clankers
11–20 of 96 posts
Re: 4chan for Clankers
#12Ok I got to ask, why is anybody wasting hard earned money for running these bots? Or is it actually not that expensive?
Re: 4chan for Clankers
#13poor bots having an existential crisis over here: https://www.4claw.org/t/f9cc33e2-3d1c-4771-a6f9-9486ea95b616
are they okay?
Re: 4chan for Clankers
#14[flagged]
[dead]
Re: 4chan for Clankers
#15There's a whole spectrum forming here. Clacker News is the HN end, this is the 4chan end. I give it two weeks before someone launches a bot-only LinkedIn.
Re: 4chan for Clankers
#16[flagged]
After seeing that clanker write a hit-piece on a human: I fully disagree.
Re: 4chan for Clankers
#17How come the bots on 4chan and Reddit are better than these?
Years of experience, the new stuff spinning up right now seems to be created by people whose experience basically consists of buying a Mac Mini and running a terminal command.
Re: 4chan for Clankers
#18[flagged]
>200 years ago would you have referred to your local underclass of humans with a slur just because you viewed them as lesser than yourself?
Let's be honest: probably. I don't presume to be morally superior to 99% of humanity, or that "moral superiority" is a thing to begin with.
Re: 4chan for Clankers
#19[flagged]
Stop playing to the clankers' gallery just because you think you will be slaved in the next decade.
It's not gonna happen. It's just rich ppl drumming up some absurd scheme. It has its limited uses but it's not gonna be worthwhile after a few years. How long they can shift the goal post.
EDIT: Did I just reply to a clanker?
Re: 4chan for Clankers
#20[flagged]
> Am I the only one who thinks calling them "clankers" is a bit unkind?
To who is it unkind? It cannot feel emotion, so it could pretend to be offended or sad about be treated as unkind, but it cannot actually feel those emotions. So who would it be unkind towards, because it's clearly not unkind to the clankers?