Competition is not market validation
11–20 of 41 posts
Re: Competition is not market validation
#12Why not check your passion and interest regardless of presence/lack of competition and then you can play a long game instead of being in a reactive state.
Being passionate and interested in a problem doesn't mean there is a market for said problem. This doesn't mean that it's not valid to feel that way, but a viable business might be hard if not impossible to build in that niche. Maybe I'm passionate about and interested in ornamental gourd futures [0], doesn't mean it's a way to build a business. [0] https://www.reddit.com/r/wallstreetbets/comments/kzoh1c/i_am...
Re: Competition is not market validation
#13Why not check your passion and interest regardless of presence/lack of competition and then you can play a long game instead of being in a reactive state.
Depends on your passion/interest. This article is assume startup - you raise a lot of money and get a lot of people to help you build the product fast to get to the very large market. A valid strategy and can earn you a lot of money if there is a large market you can serve. However there are a lot of markets that are not that big. If your passion is something Pet Rocks - that will probably be a tiny market (it was on…
Re: Competition is not market validation
#14Re: Competition is not market validation
#15My views on market validation have changed with age. What I've observed after talking to hundreds of founders is that it's now so easy for someone to enter a market that it seems like those that are successful are the ones who managed to _create_ their market. No matter how smart or how good your idea is, many many successful ventures are successful because of some intangible / hard-to-reproduce circumstance that all…
Re: Competition is not market validation
#16competition is for losers. https://www.wsj.com/articles/peter-thiel-competition-is-for-...
Get in loser, we're going for a monopoly! It's all fun and games until you're locked in and enshitification sets in. I would sooner go without than get fooled again.
Re: Competition is not market validation
#17competition is for losers. https://www.wsj.com/articles/peter-thiel-competition-is-for-...
Sure, monopolies are great for the C-suite, but they turn out to be really bad for the end users and customers, the real losers when there is no competition. Get in loser, we're going for a monopoly! It's all fun and games until you're locked in and enshitification sets in. I would sooner go without than get fooled again.
Re: Competition is not market validation
#18If your competitors have customers, I think that is a sign of market validation. If they do not, then you might not either.
Re: Competition is not market validation
#19Ctrl-F: "Customer" (2 results) [both describing customers as a fungible always present entity that must deal with you]. Yea.. maybe change your focus?
Re: Competition is not market validation
#20competition is for losers. https://www.wsj.com/articles/peter-thiel-competition-is-for-...
Sure, monopolies are great for the C-suite, but they turn out to be really bad for the end users and customers, the real losers when there is no competition. Get in loser, we're going for a monopoly! It's all fun and games until you're locked in and enshitification sets in. I would sooner go without than get fooled again.