Live data from Hacker News

The Tesla Approach to Distributing and Servicing Cars

teslamotors.com

11–20 of 139 posts

Re: The Tesla Approach to Distributing and Servicing Cars

#11
The whole approach seems very much alike to Apple Retail stores strategy. High foot traffic locations, product specialists working not on commission, a lot of service centres - Tesla "Genius" bars. Applying proven working strategy in a different industry is a very smart move from Tesla. I see no reason why it wouldn't work.

Re: The Tesla Approach to Distributing and Servicing Cars

#12
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I can't see how Tesla can expect to afford free supercharger stations forever though. Because they sell more power back into the grid than they use up. I'm guessing they'll just add more solar panels (a fixed cost) as the number of charging stations at a given Supercharger goes up.

This might be impractical but I'd love to see standardization across different car companies so all the different electric cars from different auto manufacturers can share the same / similar charging facilities. Sort of like if I have a smart phone and I go to a friend's house it would be nice to be able to charge my phone on their charger. Phone chargers are cheap. Car chargers are not so much.

There's a standard in North America: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SAE_J1772

Re: The Tesla Approach to Distributing and Servicing Cars

#13

The whole approach seems very much alike to Apple Retail stores strategy. High foot traffic locations, product specialists working not on commission, a lot of service centres - Tesla "Genius" bars. Applying proven working strategy in a different industry is a very smart move from Tesla. I see no reason why it wouldn't work.

That would be because they hired George Blankenship, who previously created Apple's retail strategy: http://www.teslamotors.com/about/executive-bios#blankenship

Re: The Tesla Approach to Distributing and Servicing Cars

#14
Of course vested interests in old industries will do whatever they can to block innovation. We're seeing it with all major industry disruptions. It used to be enough for the vested interests to write laws to block out, limit, or otherwise hinder additional traditional competitors (taxi medallions, ridiculous license requirements for florists[1], etc).

Now we're seeing these same groups try to initiate and bring in new laws to stop competition that is truly an innovative take on an industry. Such as the Uber amendment[2] that was to be written and voted on in less than 24 hours, or cease and desist notices being sent to Lyft and SideCar, telling them to shelve their business while they investigate whether or not they are doing something illegal[3].

Entrenched industries with connections to governments, and governments making tax revenue from these entrenched businesses both have a huge incentive to get old laws enforced past their original intent (which were often written for the sole purpose of protecting those entrenched businesses anyway) and new laws written and passed to shut this down.

However, these truly innovative companies are filling a need that the old ones don't. That's why there are more Uber black cars in SF than there were black cars in traditional services before Uber[4]. These companies that are pushing society forward have so much momentum and support from the communities using them that lawmakers are better served listening to the people than ignoring them.

I have no doubt that Elon Musk and Tesla will be able to disrupt the car-buying market by selling direct to customers. Maybe we'll see another startup come along and piggyback off of their success by selling other cars direct, blatantly ignoring the protectionist laws, and consumers rally behind them to get the laws changed.

I don't know where the future lies in the auto industry, but I do know that innovation and forward progress won't be stopped in the long run, no matter how many road blocks there are. I have huge respect for all of these companies that are not only working on doing the incredibly hard task of creating and trying to sustain a company, but having to fight much larger corporations at the same time.

1. http://abcnews.go.com/WNT/story?id=131571&page=1

2. http://blog.uber.com/2012/07/09/strike-down-the-minimum-fare...

3. http://thesidecarblog.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/sidecar_cp...

4. From Travis Kalanick's talk at Startup School

Re: The Tesla Approach to Distributing and Servicing Cars

#16
"The Product Specialists (...) goal and the sole metric of their success is to have you enjoy the experience of visiting so much that you look forward to returning again."

This is not the experience I had. Walked into a Tesla store, said I want to test drive a Roadster. Salesman went into that profiling mode that all car salesmen do constantly and no customer likes, asking me all kinds of questions to find out how much I earn. Since my answers didn't please him, he told me I could test drive it for $300 for half a day - essentially renting it.

I won't be going back.

Re: The Tesla Approach to Distributing and Servicing Cars

#17
post #16

"The Product Specialists (...) goal and the sole metric of their success is to have you enjoy the experience of visiting so much that you look forward to returning again." This is not the experience I had. Walked into a Tesla store, said I want to test drive a Roadster. Salesman went into that profiling mode that all car salesmen do constantly and no customer likes, asking me all kinds of questions to find out how mu…

Hasn't the Roadster been sold out for quite a while now?

Re: The Tesla Approach to Distributing and Servicing Cars

#18
post #17
post #16

"The Product Specialists (...) goal and the sole metric of their success is to have you enjoy the experience of visiting so much that you look forward to returning again." This is not the experience I had. Walked into a Tesla store, said I want to test drive a Roadster. Salesman went into that profiling mode that all car salesmen do constantly and no customer likes, asking me all kinds of questions to find out how mu…

Hasn't the Roadster been sold out for quite a while now?

This was about 1 year ago.

Re: The Tesla Approach to Distributing and Servicing Cars

#19
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I can't see how Tesla can expect to afford free supercharger stations forever though. Because they sell more power back into the grid than they use up. I'm guessing they'll just add more solar panels (a fixed cost) as the number of charging stations at a given Supercharger goes up.

This might be impractical but I'd love to see standardization across different car companies so all the different electric cars from different auto manufacturers can share the same / similar charging facilities. Sort of like if I have a smart phone and I go to a friend's house it would be nice to be able to charge my phone on their charger. Phone chargers are cheap. Car chargers are not so much.

This can happen in 2 ways, they are forced to or they do it out of the kindness of their hearts (monetary incentive). So the smart play is to do this because it will increase sales for all the electric car companies. Then a Tesla would have to figure out a way to limit the supercharger or charge non tesla cars.

Re: The Tesla Approach to Distributing and Servicing Cars

#20
post #15

Why is it called Model S? Any play on the Model T?

I'm not sure they've given an official reason, but it's the mass-market sedan adaptation of the Tesla Roadster, so I believe playing off both the Model T (mass-produced consumer car) and S=sedan.
Post reply on HN